Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,017 posts)

5. They would have confirmed someone if it was last year, just like they did with Kagan

Fri Jul 8, 2016, 08:12 PM

Jul 2016

and Sotomayor. Itd be a liberal for a liberal. The reason theyre not this year is because its an election year and its for Scalia.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AP interview: Ginsburg doesn�t want to envision a Trump win [View all] DonViejo Jul 2016 OP

I love her Skinner Jul 2016 #1

Her saying she opposes Roe v Wade really tarnishes her legacy imo. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #3

She should have retired for Obama then she wouldnt have to worry. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #2

Then there would be 7 on the court TexasProgresive Jul 2016 #4

She should retire the next time the Dems have both the Senate and WH pstokely Jul 2016 #6

Thats what Thurgood Marshall thought. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #7