Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(170,366 posts)

3. LOL

Fri Jul 8, 2016, 11:18 PM

Jul 2016

latent?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Yorker - "The Horrific, Predictable Result of a Widely Armed Citizenry" [View all] TomCADem Jul 2016 OP

Pieces that examine only one side of an issue are not very convincing Albertoo Jul 2016 #1

I do not want an armed citizenry. babylonsister Jul 2016 #2

Too late... :( radical noodle Jul 2016 #4

Not entrusting the citizens is inviting Big Brother Albertoo Jul 2016 #20

LOL Skittles Jul 2016 #3

This is a factual analysis of the problem. There is no side here. morningfog Jul 2016 #6

factual, except for the part about oswald killing JFK. sorry, Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #7

I beg to differ. Even the title is anti gun. Albertoo Jul 2016 #21

I don't need a gun to protect me from terrorists or dictators. longship Jul 2016 #8

Common denominator: Nevernose Jul 2016 #5

Amen, brother cadaverdog Jul 2016 #9

Can I steal your last line? mindfulNJ Jul 2016 #19

That fugging simple malaise Jul 2016 #22

Wish I could K & R this 1,000 times. Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #11

K&R octoberlib Jul 2016 #12

KnR Hekate Jul 2016 #13

K&R scarletwoman Jul 2016 #14

k and fucking r KG Jul 2016 #15

What You Said Night Watchman Jul 2016 #16

Excellent summary of the issue BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #18