Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rifle identified in Dallas shootings as an SKS. Semi-auto - typically 10rnd fixed mag EDIT - OR NOT. [View all]hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)59. My idea would be this
Subject any large capacity clips to an intense background check and a $1500 dollar license.
Don't worry about the ones already in circulation because generally it seems like mass shooters are people who go out and get their guns before the shooting, not collectors.
Then give each magazine a serial number and a title just like a car and to sell it you must transfer the title and go thru a background check.
The shooter had military training and I personally think he could have killed all those cops with a revolver and bolt action rifle.
However drastically limiting high capacity magazines to collectors would at least give some people a fighting chance.
By limiting magazines and also still allowing them for people willing to jump thru the hoops you would not run afoul of the 2nd amendment crowd.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rifle identified in Dallas shootings as an SKS. Semi-auto - typically 10rnd fixed mag EDIT - OR NOT. [View all]
jmg257
Jul 2016
OP
Is that the actual rifle used in the Dallas shooting or just an example of a modified one?
aikoaiko
Jul 2016
#6
Yep. Obviously he used its lethal capabilities. I wonder how many gun yahoos will be buying one or
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#9
Truthfully, your lethal weapons knowledge is not impressive. You might want to try the Gungeon.
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#13
Hence, the preoccupation of media outlets after a fatal stabbing to identify the weapon as a...
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#134
The Gun Nomenclature game is a waste of time, we've heard it before from you guys.
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#52
We've certainly heard your shtick ad nauseam, but no one tells you to take it GCRA.
aikoaiko
Jul 2016
#55
If you expect to regulate firearms, you must be specific in definitions in order to do so.
MohRokTah
Jul 2016
#97
My Remington 700, and scores of similar "deer rifles," will pierce the best armor.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#90
Of what, DC? Quit trying to be coy when the mere recitation of facts is made.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#92
At least it offers more protection than the useless flak vest I had to suffer LOL
Marengo
Jul 2016
#85
Yes and no. If you include the standard SKS rifle in the definition of an assault weapon, you would
aikoaiko
Jul 2016
#46
Go for it because we don't seem to have any clever or motivated intelligent people in congress.
aikoaiko
Jul 2016
#49
Even in the great anti-assault weapon state of California, standard SKSs are not assault weapons...
aikoaiko
Jul 2016
#48
I can't think of any assault weapons ban ever proposed that would include them
Recursion
Jul 2016
#53
ALL semi-autos "do the exact same thing" as an AR. They ALL self load the next round
jmg257
Jul 2016
#67
Or a way of writing effective legislation. "Killing device that spat bullets" might be tough to work
jmg257
Jul 2016
#118
NOW you're talking - straight and to the point. No guess work, no loopholes. nt
jmg257
Jul 2016
#121
Background checks as currently done are pretty useless at the point of sale....
Sancho
Jul 2016
#132
Way too unconstitutional. I do support a proficiency test for carrying in public...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#133