Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns from buy backs are resold by police departments [View all]Straw Man
(6,949 posts)21. Allow me to retort.
Wow, a really popular post. Got lots of responses. Not one responded to the central issue of the OP: that PD's are, at best, implying that all guns given into a buyback program will be taken permanently out of circulation, but are in fact, recycling them back out onto the streets. Maybe some of their promotions are so deceptive they're even legally actionable. I wouldn't know.
Implying? I've never seen a buyback that promised they would do x, y, or z with the guns. People bring their guns to the buyback to get rid of them and get the gift card. People who get outraged over what police are going to do with the guns are generally people who don't own any guns in the first place. But if it irks you so much, perhaps you could retain an attorney and try to sue some police department over the operation of their buyback program. I'm sure that will be helpful to everyone.
The drug thing was satire, which of course you knew. All of you guys have the same strategy: you look for some random thing in a post that you can criticize so you can throw some verbiage against the wall and when you get a response, it's lather, rinse, repeat. And you always have to have the last word, no matter how incoherent and irrelevant that last word is.
Here's a hint: If you want your satire to be effective, your analogies should hold up. And before you accuse others of incoherence and irrelevance, you might want to address some of the actual criticisms of your "satire."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Buy back at a "nominal" fee or, the gun amnesty programs where guns are turned in for . . .
brush
Jul 2016
#12
Sounds like double talk to me. They should take the opportunity to destroy the guns . . .
brush
Jul 2016
#28
It puts them back on the street under the false pretense that they are being taken off of the street
SkeleTim1968
Jul 2016
#5
When drugs become legal, I expect that may happen. Why throw away a good commodity?
jmg257
Jul 2016
#11
Ah - thanks - now that makes much more sense. If people turning in guns really are concerned
jmg257
Jul 2016
#18
They should be removed from circulation entirely, melted down and recycled...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#6
Its nothing like burning a "satanic" album or book, do those albums or books increase the...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#32
You do bring up a good point, I would also advocate for an elimination in the production of...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#34
Since a "buy BACK" suggests a former owner, turn them over to the manufacturer....
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#9
So damned discouraging. Sooner or later the people who need their lives sane will win. n/t
Judi Lynn
Jul 2016
#24