Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Advice for Police: [View all]
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
45. I don't want to assume what your intent is here, but it feels as if
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 01:23 AM
Jul 2016

you're saying my brother-in-law would have been profiled as a potential terrorist. If he were here he'd be laughing out loud at you.

Now I want to make it very clear that I'm an anti-gun nut, as extreme in my way as certain gun nuts are in there way. But even in my extremism I can understand that someone like him simply was never a potential terrorist.

And that's precisely what's wrong with both profiling and the current system at airports. I'm a former airline employee. I went to work as a ticket agent at DCA in January, 1969, well before any security. We used to happily let people out on the ramps if the wanted to photograph airplanes. No one thought it was a problem of any kind. And then certain nut cases decided it would be giant fun to hijack airplanes to Cuba. Which is exactly why the first security procedures came into effect in 1971, I think. And they worked very well.

Which is exactly why I know that the current security bullshit is just that: bullshit. It doesn't make us safer. I do NOT feel safe when I see elderly nuns patted down, or two year olds being sent through the metal detector while crying for mommy.

Plus, every so often I think about what I might do were I do want to perpetrate some sort of terrorist attack. Keep in mind, I have zero interest in actually doing so, and my knowledge of guns or explosives is less than minimal, and I haven't a clue how to get ahold of such things. But those considerations aside, various sorts of terrorist attacks would be remarkably easy. I once briefly discussed one such scenario I had in mind with the afore-mentioned brother-in-law, and he agreed it would be fairly easy to pull off, once the appropriate weapons were obtained. Sometimes I'm surprised that such an attack has never happened.

Which, I think, tells us a lot about the potential terrorists and how much of our culture they don't understand.

As an American, with my understanding of our culture, if I wanted to attack this country, I'd do it on a Super Bowl Sunday. If I were patient enough, I'd wait for a year when the Washington Redskins (or whatever name they might have in the future) were in the Super Bowl. Trust me, having lived in DC one year they were in the game, a foreign army could invade, no one would notice until after the game were over, or perhaps not for two or three days were the Redskins to win.

Clearly, our potential enemies really don't understand this country.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Advice for Police: [View all] RobertEarl Jul 2016 OP
Last OP proposing this did not go how you wanted? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #1
A Glutton for punishment I guess. nt Logical Jul 2016 #3
Roll those dice one more time. I guess. longship Jul 2016 #4
Someone crapped out Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #62
Was curious why he did not respond Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #63
Two is the magic number for a 24 hour period Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #64
We shall see Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #65
It was ok RobertEarl Jul 2016 #8
Cool Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #13
Well, do you? RobertEarl Jul 2016 #32
Hey! RobertEarl Jul 2016 #35
gun humpers are the only ones on my ignore list. stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #51
Didn't you take enough of an ass kicking for the last time you posted this silly idea? nt Logical Jul 2016 #2
It seemed so Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #6
Put them in Walmart bravenak Jul 2016 #5
Yep and be sure to call the police and lie Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #9
Whoa! bravenak Jul 2016 #23
Ok, maybe I read that wrong Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #25
seems like it would be more effective to put those cops in Chicago Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #28
Maybe we should place some of the cops at police stations to catch bad cops? bravenak Jul 2016 #30
More importantly, how can I get on your ignore list? B2G Jul 2016 #7
LOL, good one! nt Logical Jul 2016 #10
So how exactly would a potential mass shooter stand out from the thousands of Statistical Jul 2016 #11
Check 'em all out. RobertEarl Jul 2016 #14
do you know how common gun humping nutcases are? Skittles Jul 2016 #15
Too common RobertEarl Jul 2016 #20
Once again what exactly are you looking for? Statistical Jul 2016 #18
Not Bob, but Robert is Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #21
ROFL!! WillowTree Jul 2016 #44
I welcome an officer checking me out. RobertEarl Jul 2016 #22
Again, I do not use public shooting ranges. oneshooter Jul 2016 #57
Remember, they need to be posted in the desert out west Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #17
I go on my back deck. Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #27
Lucky Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #29
How to you check all ammo sales? Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #12
Computers. RobertEarl Jul 2016 #16
And tip them off? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #19
Exactly. Good thinking. bravenak Jul 2016 #24
I bought some ammo and paid cash. Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #26
You'd need a prescription to buy ammo. nt greyl Jul 2016 #41
Precogs bravenak Jul 2016 #31
My brother-in-law (now deceased) SheilaT Jul 2016 #33
They call it profiling RobertEarl Jul 2016 #34
Let me get this straight? Separation Jul 2016 #37
Mainly gun nuts, yes. RobertEarl Jul 2016 #39
"Mainly gun nuts" TeddyR Jul 2016 #42
Who else Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #48
I will ask again RobertEarl Jul 2016 #59
As bad is the truth is Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #60
I don't want to assume what your intent is here, but it feels as if SheilaT Jul 2016 #45
Questions: How would a potential "mass shooter" look at a gun range? Or, how much ammo does an avid jonno99 Jul 2016 #36
You got that right RobertEarl Jul 2016 #38
You mean like they "checked out" the Orlando shooter - multiple times? nt jonno99 Jul 2016 #40
So now you want the police to perform psych evals? TeddyR Jul 2016 #43
If they do proctology exams while they're at it they can kill 2 birds! pinboy3niner Jul 2016 #50
I don't go to a commercial gun range. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #46
Your fucking world? RobertEarl Jul 2016 #47
The high desert, silly. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #55
How many agents . no agents just one are two drones. stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #53
Mental Assessment Drones, or MADs for short pinboy3niner Jul 2016 #54
Let's work on getting them to police their own first. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #49
K&R! stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #52
Easy peasy - 21 million background checks to buy guns in 2014, 23 mil in 2015. jmg257 Jul 2016 #56
Lots of work to do RobertEarl Jul 2016 #58
Yep let the drunk drivers back on the road Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Advice for Police»Reply #45