Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There are NO ISLANDS AT ALL in the Spratly Islands, UNCLOS tribunal rules! [View all]Miquelon does have an economic exclusion zone and it's 200 miles long too, just very narrow due to adjacent Canadian claims
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are NO ISLANDS AT ALL in the Spratly Islands, UNCLOS tribunal rules! [View all]
uawchild
Jul 2016
OP
Well that's the point, some do, some don't, some have negotiated local arrangements. nt
bemildred
Jul 2016
#27
Size doesn't matter; from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#16
According to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, an island has 12 nautical miles of territori
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#17
The standard is whether such islands can "sustain human habitation or economic life of their own"
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#39
"Honestly, how much human habitation?" That's probably why they have tribunals (nt)
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#42
So no stated standards? I see. No chance of bias with clearly stated standards.
uawchild
Jul 2016
#44