Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There are NO ISLANDS AT ALL in the Spratly Islands, UNCLOS tribunal rules! [View all]uawchild
(2,208 posts)38. "Trees can grow in the cracks of rocks"
And that's what you think is happening here?
Let's look at that picture of Taiping Island again :

Trees growing in the cracks of rocks?!? -rolls eyes-
But ok, that's one for the "It's a Rock!" column.
Thank you for replying
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are NO ISLANDS AT ALL in the Spratly Islands, UNCLOS tribunal rules! [View all]
uawchild
Jul 2016
OP
Well that's the point, some do, some don't, some have negotiated local arrangements. nt
bemildred
Jul 2016
#27
Size doesn't matter; from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#16
According to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, an island has 12 nautical miles of territori
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#17
The standard is whether such islands can "sustain human habitation or economic life of their own"
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#39
"Honestly, how much human habitation?" That's probably why they have tribunals (nt)
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#42
So no stated standards? I see. No chance of bias with clearly stated standards.
uawchild
Jul 2016
#44