Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
3. Here's a PhD that "doesn't get" it
Sun Jul 17, 2016, 02:47 AM
Jul 2016
I Used to Work as a Scientist with GMOs—Now I'm Having Serious Second Thoughts About The Risks

I believe that GMO crops still run far ahead of our understanding of their risks.

Jonathan Latham, PhD / CounterPunch September 2, 2015

By training, I am a plant biologist. In the early 1990s I was busy making genetically modified plants (often called GMOs for Genetically Modified Organisms) as part of the research that led to my PhD. Into these plants we were putting DNA from various foreign organisms, such as viruses and bacteria.

I was not, at the outset, concerned about the possible effects of GM plants on human health or the environment. One reason for this lack of concern was that I was still a very young scientist, feeling my way in the complex world of biology and of scientific research. Another reason was that we hardly imagined that GMOs like ours would be grown or eaten. So far as I was concerned, all GMOs were for research purposes only.

Gradually, however, it became clear that certain companies thought differently. Some of my older colleagues shared their skepticism with me that commercial interests were running far ahead of scientific knowledge. I listened carefully and I didn’t disagree. Today, over twenty years later, GMO crops, especially soybeans, corn, papaya, canola and cotton, are commercially grown in numerous parts of the world.

Depending on which country you live in, GMOs may be unlabeled and therefore unknowingly abundant in your diet. Processed foods (e.g. chips, breakfast cereals, sodas) are likely to contain ingredients from GMO crops, because they are often made from corn or soy. Most agricultural crops, however, are still non-GMO, including rice, wheat, barley, oats, tomatoes, grapes and beans...snip

The True Purpose of GMOs

Science is not the only grounds on which GMOs should be judged. The commercial purpose of GMOs is not to feed the world or improve farming. Rather, they exist to gain intellectual property (i.e. patent rights) over seeds and plant breeding and to drive agriculture in directions that benefit agribusiness. snip
Read More: http://www.alternet.org/food/i-used-work-scientist-gmos-now-im-having-serious-second-thoughts-about-risks

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Transparency is the very least I should be able to expect from someone merrily Jul 2016 #1
I hate the idea PatSeg Jul 2016 #10
Ever since internet deities made google, you have been eminently qualified to know merrily Jul 2016 #21
And you know PatSeg Jul 2016 #22
I agree! Why have your liver working overtime to get rid of poisons in your costly food? merrily Jul 2016 #24
Well PatSeg Jul 2016 #26
Ya think? Fortunately, it so subtle! merrily Jul 2016 #27
Oh very, very subtle PatSeg Jul 2016 #29
Who doesn't get that EVERY food item you purchase is genetically engineered? No exceptions... pipoman Jul 2016 #2
Here's a PhD that "doesn't get" it nationalize the fed Jul 2016 #3
I have been around the ag seed industry for 50 years pipoman Jul 2016 #4
Truth. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #5
Genetic engineering PatSeg Jul 2016 #8
Thank you PatSeg Jul 2016 #9
If true, then, disclosure should be no big deal. None at all. merrily Jul 2016 #25
85% of Americans in one survey wanted GMO food labeled to say it's GMO. Igel Jul 2016 #6
Not to mention how much of your food has dihydrogen monoxide in it. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #12
Seriously? PatSeg Jul 2016 #15
As far as the complete stupidity and gullibility of the general public goes, yes. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #16
That's pretty sad PatSeg Jul 2016 #17
As far as issues related to science are concerned, yes, there are. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #18
That is a bit of an overstatement I think PatSeg Jul 2016 #20
I just want to add PatSeg Jul 2016 #23
K&R... coco77 Jul 2016 #7
So we're going to put a label on almost every food product. NYC Liberal Jul 2016 #11
We already have labels on almost PatSeg Jul 2016 #14
Then just buy the foods labeled non-GMO. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #19
I demand video documentation of all food sold in the US Orrex Jul 2016 #13
For you... msanthrope Jul 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI)...»Reply #3