Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Being confronted by armed strangers in what should be a secure place... [View all]Orrex
(66,830 posts)45. Your expertise is greatly valuable to us
Having on one occason left a restaurant after ordering (but not eating) my food, I'm saddened to learn that I am a criminal. Please share the specific statute that covers this kind of situation.
Thank you!
Now that I think of it, I once had to have an employee search for an item in a store's backroom inventory. I thereafter opted to exit the store without purchasing it, even after the employee had labored to produce it. Was I a criminal then, too?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
may you have better luck than I did. when I told a local business owner that I would no longer
niyad
Jul 2016
#136
alas, this is an open carry state that recalled two state senators for the merest hint
niyad
Jul 2016
#149
Why is it that the biggest open carry assholes only do it in places where there's no danger at all?
Iggo
Jul 2016
#38
Would you actually pay for a meal if you were forced to eat it somewhere where you felt threatened?
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#24
You are asking for the specific statute that says ordering services and refusing to pay for them...
TipTok
Jul 2016
#53
I saw a gun, made me nervous, so i left, too many mass shootings lately and....
Logical
Jul 2016
#62
General response, with quote of actual Theft/Services law...it would be a misdemeanor if...
jmg257
Jul 2016
#83
Understood, so because your intent is presumed, are you guilty of Theft/Services
jmg257
Jul 2016
#101
What a silly statement. If you intended to pay, but had no money, does that mean you're not guilty?
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#102
HUH? If you ordered when you had no money, then you had intent...you dash - you are guilty.
jmg257
Jul 2016
#106
Yeah, considering that's the whole gist of this thread (leaving a card explaining why you left..)
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#107
When did i say that? I know guns are your deal, but some people are scared of them......
Logical
Jul 2016
#72
It's a class C misdemeanor in Texas (for less than $100). I cited the statute upthread.
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#79
If the intent from the beginning was not to pay! Wow, are you really not understanding....
Logical
Jul 2016
#82
I don't like thieves and I don't like people who make other people pay for their personal problems..
TipTok
Jul 2016
#127
Self preservation supersedes that ethical dilemma. I'm not trying to dig out my card when...
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#32
we agree its rationalization, its a good one and fitting for the situation at hand...
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#37
Lol, so the police will tell you that you have no right to be scared of guns? I do not....
Logical
Jul 2016
#41
False dichotomy, one can remove themselves from danger and reconcile a bill later
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#61
I would take great pleasure in not paying for it and in making it very clear why it's not ok.
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#130
Some people are entirely comfortable eating their meals surrounded by killing devices
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#26
There may have been an exception for peace officers; however, he really should have
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#104
Understood, but he had a responsibility to be aware of local law, especially if he intended
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#111
