Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Being confronted by armed strangers in what should be a secure place... [View all]StrictlyRockers
(3,933 posts)130. I would take great pleasure in not paying for it and in making it very clear why it's not ok.
It's not ok to bring killing machines into the place my family is breaking bread.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
may you have better luck than I did. when I told a local business owner that I would no longer
niyad
Jul 2016
#136
alas, this is an open carry state that recalled two state senators for the merest hint
niyad
Jul 2016
#149
Why is it that the biggest open carry assholes only do it in places where there's no danger at all?
Iggo
Jul 2016
#38
Would you actually pay for a meal if you were forced to eat it somewhere where you felt threatened?
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#24
You are asking for the specific statute that says ordering services and refusing to pay for them...
TipTok
Jul 2016
#53
I saw a gun, made me nervous, so i left, too many mass shootings lately and....
Logical
Jul 2016
#62
General response, with quote of actual Theft/Services law...it would be a misdemeanor if...
jmg257
Jul 2016
#83
Understood, so because your intent is presumed, are you guilty of Theft/Services
jmg257
Jul 2016
#101
What a silly statement. If you intended to pay, but had no money, does that mean you're not guilty?
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#102
HUH? If you ordered when you had no money, then you had intent...you dash - you are guilty.
jmg257
Jul 2016
#106
Yeah, considering that's the whole gist of this thread (leaving a card explaining why you left..)
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#107
When did i say that? I know guns are your deal, but some people are scared of them......
Logical
Jul 2016
#72
It's a class C misdemeanor in Texas (for less than $100). I cited the statute upthread.
X_Digger
Jul 2016
#79
If the intent from the beginning was not to pay! Wow, are you really not understanding....
Logical
Jul 2016
#82
I don't like thieves and I don't like people who make other people pay for their personal problems..
TipTok
Jul 2016
#127
Self preservation supersedes that ethical dilemma. I'm not trying to dig out my card when...
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#32
we agree its rationalization, its a good one and fitting for the situation at hand...
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#37
Lol, so the police will tell you that you have no right to be scared of guns? I do not....
Logical
Jul 2016
#41
False dichotomy, one can remove themselves from danger and reconcile a bill later
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#61
I would take great pleasure in not paying for it and in making it very clear why it's not ok.
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#130
Some people are entirely comfortable eating their meals surrounded by killing devices
StrictlyRockers
Jul 2016
#26
There may have been an exception for peace officers; however, he really should have
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#104
Understood, but he had a responsibility to be aware of local law, especially if he intended
LongtimeAZDem
Jul 2016
#111