Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
41. The charges convinced them?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 12:50 AM
Jun 2012
Interesting choice of words.


http://archive.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/061115/witness.shtml

Witnesses in Siegelman trial sentenced to prison
By Bob Johnson

Associated Press Writer

MONTGOMERY — Two key witnesses in the case that led to the conviction of former Gov. Don Siegelman and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy were sentenced to federal prison terms Tuesday.

Lobbyist and landfill developer Lanny Young was sentenced to two years in prison for bribery-related charges, fined $25,000 and ordered to serve three years of supervised probation after his release from prison.

Former longtime Siegelman aide Nick Bailey was sentenced to 18 months in prison and three years of supervised probation on bribery-related charges, but he was not fined.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Siegelman

The Court did strike down two of the seven charges on which Siegelman was convicted, and it ordered a new sentencing hearing. That means Siegelman's seven-year sentence could be reduced.

Partiality of the jury

Documents indicated that prosecutors interviewed two jurors while the court was reviewing charges of juror misconduct, in violation of the judge's instruction that no contact with jurors should occur without his permission.

- snip -

Alleged Misconduct by Attorney General

In November 2008, new documents revealed alleged misconduct by the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney and other prosecutors in the case. Extensive and unusual contact between the prosecution and the jury were alleged to have occurred.[22]

- snip -

Testimony of the star witness

Witness Nick Bailey, who provided the cornerstone testimony upon which the conviction was based, was subsequently convicted of extortion; upon being given 10 years in prison Bailey cooperated with prosecutors to lighten his own sentence. Although he engaged in over 70 interviews with the prosecution against Siegelman, none of the notes detailing these interviews were shared with the defense. In addition, after the case was tried it was confirmed that the check he testified he saw Scrushy write for Siegelman was actually written days later, when he was not actually present.[20][21]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kick and rec think Jun 2012 #1
KICK! Has DOJ been "captured"? patrice Jun 2012 #2
DU Tries Octafish Jun 2012 #3
What could possibly be the justification for the DoJ not to rhett o rick Jun 2012 #4
k&r n/t lordsummerisle Jun 2012 #5
Gov. Don Siegelman, the Roughly $3.6 Billion, ExxonMobil, and Pissing Off BIG OIL. L. Coyote Jun 2012 #6
So, the DOJ went after Siegelman to protect Jack Abramoff? Freddie Stubbs Jun 2012 #7
Jack Abramoff wrote a so-called confessional autobiography JDPriestly Jun 2012 #24
The charges were enough to convince a jury to vote unanimously to convict him Freddie Stubbs Jun 2012 #28
A witness lied. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #39
The charges convinced them? Hissyspit Jun 2012 #41
Yet people STILL have faith in the electoral system........... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #8
We DO call it that. The questions are about how to create critical mass to overturn corruption. patrice Jun 2012 #15
Eric Holder will get right on it... 99Forever Jun 2012 #9
I honestly thought Holder's first action as AG would be to rectify Siegelman's injustices Canuckistanian Jun 2012 #14
Holder is a spineless wimp. 99Forever Jun 2012 #18
yup--that was the beginning of my realization that Obama librechik Jun 2012 #22
President Obama should pardon Siegelman samsingh Jun 2012 #10
I agree completely..nt Stuart G Jun 2012 #11
A pardon implies Siegelman actually did something wrong. phleshdef Jun 2012 #20
A pardons doesn't imply you did anything wrong. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #36
Yes. It does. I'd advise you to look up what pardon means. phleshdef Jun 2012 #37
I know what the words 'pardon' and 'imply' mean and I stand by my statement. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #38
i just want him to be able to get on with his life samsingh Jun 2012 #46
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #12
There will be no justice The Wizard Jun 2012 #13
K&R Blue Owl Jun 2012 #16
Thank you libodem Jun 2012 #17
k&r . . . .n/t annabanana Jun 2012 #19
Is Siegelman incarcerated right now? roody Jun 2012 #21
Siegelman is to be resentenced. No hearing date yet, apparently. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #25
Meanwhile, Tom Delay is free and could be Dancing With The Stars. What a country. freshwest Jun 2012 #29
Just So You Know...tom delay is not in the system yet & may never be. solarman350 Jun 2012 #44
Thanks for taking the time to email; I suspected as much. There were a few stories in the papers, freshwest Jun 2012 #45
HR I Agree with you except, I believe that Riley via Rove stole Siegelman's win..... midnight Jun 2012 #23
Spam deleted by NRaleighLiberal (MIR Team) Pauline89 Jun 2012 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #27
I think getting justice for Don Siegelman is going to require a movement. I remember him sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #30
Why did Siegelman not get the same treatment as Stevens? FiveGoodMen Jun 2012 #31
Stevens was corrupt as hell. It wouldn't be suprising to find out at some point EFerrari Jun 2012 #32
Good question, yet to be answered. sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #33
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2012 #34
K&R! pacalo Jun 2012 #35
Tweeted this OP for more exposure. I wonder if Avaaz or one of the activist sites with a large sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #40
Thank you... midnight Jun 2012 #42
K&R Iwillnevergiveup Jun 2012 #43
K&R woo me with science Jun 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don Siegelman is a politi...»Reply #41