Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to 63splitwindow (Reply #16)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When Trump loses* they'll still spin it as a mandate... Beartracks Jul 2016 #1
election frame. hillary vs. not hillary. unblock Jul 2016 #2
They wiil also spout off about the tree of Liberty being refreshed with blood... 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #3
Protecting our freedumbs. Rex Jul 2016 #6
thats a child Fred Drum Jul 2016 #17
fucking trump wont say shit Fred Drum Jul 2016 #18
Trump loves it, he really wants some violence to rouse up his base of armed morons. Rex Jul 2016 #41
They are preaching to the converted but also rehearsing the impeachment of Clinton when she wins Monk06 Jul 2016 #4
They could possibly impeach her but they won't be able to convict her in the Senate. pnwmom Jul 2016 #20
They will do it knowing it won't succeed just out of raw spite Republicans are like Wolverines X Monk06 Jul 2016 #27
They will never let her govern, just like they threw every obstacle in Obama's way CanonRay Jul 2016 #5
That's why it is critical to win House and Senate seats as well. nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #7
The only way we will win back the congress in any meaningful was is to shift back to our roots AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #9
You don't believe that the "silent majority" tends to be moderate? 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #10
There is no such thing as 'moderate' as a political entity in the US AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #11
Not everyone agrees with your analysis. I am one of those who does not. nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #12
Between 1933 and 1980, the GOP controlled congress 4 years AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #13
Take ANY issue. Only 2 possible positions? What do you call positions NOT on far right or left? 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #14
Liberal is not 'far left' AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #15
Yeah, an entire spectrum of colors, not just "liberal" or "conservative." Good evening. 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #19
Liberal is the mildest form of leftism AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #29
Thanks for your opinions and suggestions re: research. Carry on. nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #30
It's not an opinion, it's basic poly sci 101 AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #32
The "us" you refer to is you. You are now on "ignore". Goodbye. nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #35
Even center-right is "far left" to the far right meow2u3 Jul 2016 #26
Boiled frog syndrome AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #31
"Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." LanternWaste Jul 2016 #33
There are still plenty of people in the middle who swing left some years and right others -- pnwmom Jul 2016 #22
Which right wing policies do you believe the Democrats should adopt to triangulate the 'center'? AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #36
None. Concessions would all depend on ongoing negotiations of any particular bill. pnwmom Jul 2016 #38
I'm a moderate. nt auntpurl Jul 2016 #28
You have things backwards. With our very progressive McGovern we lost by 49 states. pnwmom Jul 2016 #21
If you look at the pattern over the last 85 years you will see it AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #23
Something happened in 1991 to change everything. pnwmom Jul 2016 #24
The fall of the soviets made the GOP go off the deep end AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #37
Are you surprised? AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #8
hatred of hrc unifies the gop....hrc is their wet dream candidate dembotoz Jul 2016 #25
Moderate dems Calculating Jul 2016 #34
Always interesting how some people's primary concern is to label everyone. 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #39
The GOP has been bashing HRC for over 20 years now seanbnewyork4 Jul 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Reich Wing's out of c...»Reply #19