General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BLOWBACK...... [View all]Darb
(2,807 posts)well tainted question. What is obvious is that you are insisting upon taking the teabagger line with this and will not take no for an answer. What is also obvious is that you cannot do simple math using simple arabic numerals. The math says that a small, small, small percentage of people of the Islamic faith are contributing to the terrorism of which you so persistently whine, again, just like many others that I know whom are less than informed. This tiny minority of violent malcontents can use any excuse they would like to lash out at the west for any number of reasons. But what is wise, and prudent, and quite frankly safer, is to call them terrorists, and not to lump the entire Muslim world in with these assholes, like you, and curiously, the fuckfaces on the right want to do because you, and they, believe you are tougher, and smarter, and have bigger penises than they do, I suspect.
So, your choosing, and the teabaggers, curiously, choosing to whine about not putting "Islamic" in front of "terrorist" is nothing more than a cavemanish reaction to a smart, forward-thinking policy of not doing stupid shit in order to prove you have a large johnson, or claim to have one, or insinuate that you have one.
You see, intelligent people do not run around trying to pick fights with cavemen by insulting them and agitating them. But other cavemen do.