Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)

18. A third party would have name

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #17)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 08:51 AM

Jun 2012

and contact info other than the anon email that they would not be able to disclose but would be able to forward an email alerts in the event a user hasn't read a new email within a week or two. So a user of the anon email address could periodically update their real contact info for where the email alert were to be sent. But that contact info, again, would only be accessed in the event a user hadn't viewed a new email after a week, maybe more...depending on the user's settings and could never be disclosed by the third party government run email provider to anyone.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Spread of 'baby boxes' in Europe alarms United Nations [View all] cali Jun 2012 OP

Somebody at the UN needs a reality check Warpy Jun 2012 #1

Hear, hear, Warpy! Couldn't have said it better myself! Moonwalk Jun 2012 #2

Succinct! n/t Sans__Culottes Jun 2012 #16

EXACTLY - lots of states have enacted "Safe Haven" laws, which allows mothers of bullwinkle428 Jun 2012 #22

No shit! I think most kids, if they were able to make the choice, would give up the "right" to be MADem Jun 2012 #23

Wouldn't surprise me if Politicalboi Jun 2012 #3

The UN is just so stupid sometimes (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #4

complaining about a pretty decent bandage, one that does save lives Kali Jun 2012 #5

Being that it is Europe, don't they already have that? FrodosPet Jun 2012 #11

the countries mentioned in the OP Kali Jun 2012 #13

It's illegal in almost all circumstances in Poland muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #14

My husband was in a German home for children. Parents who can't take care of them are put southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #6

that's a lot of funeral drama. Sharing DNA with someone doesn't mean you'll get along Liberal_in_LA Jun 2012 #9

Man if you had been there you would of looked for a hole to hide in. We were so embrassed. Right southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #10

You poor dear! Glad you survived that mess! nt MADem Jun 2012 #24

Thank you. Gosh that was so many years ago. I guess it really had an impact on me. LOL southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #28

Is the RW in Europe making birth control hard to come by?? WTF??? kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #7

About six months ago... Xithras Jun 2012 #8

"known and cared for by his or her parents" -- but 10% of the "fathers" aren't! FarCenter Jun 2012 #12

A partial solution Shankapotomus Jun 2012 #15

How do you make someone monitor an email address for 18 years or more muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #17

A third party would have name Shankapotomus Jun 2012 #18

Isn't this like a normal adoption process? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #20

It is? Shankapotomus Jun 2012 #21

I agree--not feasible. The "receiving agencies" know where and when each child was received. MADem Jun 2012 #25

Great in theory. Will never work in practice. lapislzi Jun 2012 #26

Dear UN: WolverineDG Jun 2012 #19

Exactly. If you've ever taken care of an abandoned newborn, Butterbean Jun 2012 #27