General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who Do You Think Hillary's VP Pick Will Be? [View all]Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)natesilver: The Clintons arent being too subtle about this. They clearly want everyone to think that its either Kaine or Vilsack. Which is probably because it actually will be Kaine or Vilsack, and they want to see if airing their names out brings anything to the fore.Or its a misdirection, and theyre hoping to do something game-changey like pick Warren. I tend not to think it will be somewhere in between, though. You dont tease Kaine or Vilsack and then trot out another Boring White Guy.
harry: I remind readers that very few people thought Bill Clinton would pick Al Gore in 1992. And what Bill Clinton ended up doing was choosing a candidate who reinforced his bona fides.
micah: I think Warren is a no-brainer.
natesilver: Warren would create the most buzz of any pick since Sarah Palin and change the way a lot of people regard Clinton. The conventional wisdom is that shed be a risky pick, however.
clare.malone: omg, I love Clinton palace intrigue. Clinton reportedly met with Warren, and it seemed to be the kind of thing that was youre not getting the nod but lets talk about your role going forward.
micah: Warren excites the Bernie Sanders voters, she helps the ticket feel less Secretary of the status quo, (to borrow Pences wonderful turn of phrase). Warren emphasizes the historic nature of Clintons candidacy and helps defend against Trumps more populist, Wall Street-themed attacks, which I tend to think are among his most effective against Clinton.
natesilver: Well, look, thats clearly what they want us to think, Clare. They clearly want us to think its Vilsack or Kaine. Which is probably how theyd play it if it actually was Warren. They wouldnt want us to know it was Warren.
More here:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-should-trump-respond-to-the-cruz-craziness/