Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
29. Here is what the gang over at 538 has to say
Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:50 PM
Jul 2016

natesilver: The Clintons aren’t being too subtle about this. They clearly want everyone to think that it’s either Kaine or Vilsack. Which is probably because it actually will be Kaine or Vilsack, and they want to see if airing their names out brings anything to the fore.Or it’s a misdirection, and they’re hoping to do something game-changey like pick Warren. I tend not to think it will be somewhere in between, though. You don’t tease Kaine or Vilsack and then trot out another Boring White Guy.

harry: I remind readers that very few people thought Bill Clinton would pick Al Gore in 1992. And what Bill Clinton ended up doing was choosing a candidate who reinforced his bona fides.

micah: I think Warren is a no-brainer.

natesilver: Warren would create the most buzz of any pick since Sarah Palin and change the way a lot of people regard Clinton. The conventional wisdom is that she’d be a “risky” pick, however.

clare.malone: omg, I love Clinton palace intrigue. Clinton reportedly met with Warren, and it seemed to be the kind of thing that was “you’re not getting the nod but let’s talk about your role going forward.”

micah: Warren excites the Bernie Sanders voters, she helps the ticket feel less “Secretary of the status quo,” (to borrow Pence’s wonderful turn of phrase). Warren emphasizes the historic nature of Clinton’s candidacy and helps defend against Trump’s more populist, Wall Street-themed attacks, which I tend to think are among his most effective against Clinton.

natesilver: Well, look, that’s clearly what they want us to think, Clare. They clearly want us to think it’s Vilsack or Kaine. Which is probably how they’d play it if it actually was Warren. They wouldn’t want us to know it was Warren.


More here:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-should-trump-respond-to-the-cruz-craziness/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Elizabeth Warren. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #1
I hope so Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #7
Kaine. Peregrine Took Jul 2016 #2
We may find out in the next few hours. Kingofalldems Jul 2016 #3
Cory Booker... kentuck Jul 2016 #4
You're right about that ... I've always been partial to him. NurseJackie Jul 2016 #23
Oh hell no MattBaggins Jul 2016 #26
Booker does not cover bases... tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #44
Julian Castro...n/t chillfactor Jul 2016 #5
Unlikely SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2016 #39
Tim Kaine lamp_shade Jul 2016 #6
There's been so much Kaine talk, I'm betting it's a fake for either Warren or Perez. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #8
Could be Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #14
I know who won't be! imanamerican63 Jul 2016 #9
I'm resigned to Kaine being selected; but I desperately hope my gut is wrong. LonePirate Jul 2016 #10
Pick Bill. Pick Bill. I'm not a fan but I'd love to watch the repukes heads explode en masse NightWatcher Jul 2016 #11
He's constitutionally ineligible. Angleae Jul 2016 #34
I fear Kaine edhopper Jul 2016 #12
I really don't think you need to worry that Hortensis Jul 2016 #22
But he is edhopper Jul 2016 #24
The world isn't black or white and people Hortensis Jul 2016 #28
You should read up on him too edhopper Jul 2016 #31
I want Warren because I want her and the signal Hortensis Jul 2016 #33
Hillary has at least the perception of being edhopper Jul 2016 #36
Well, although I wouldn't be thrilled, Hortensis Jul 2016 #37
Yes edhopper Jul 2016 #38
She'll be the new boss. Hortensis Jul 2016 #40
yeah edhopper Jul 2016 #42
I think it will be Kaine....but.... BooScout Jul 2016 #13
I wasn't, but now I am, leaning to Warren. Hillary doesn't really need foreign expertise in a VP. tonyt53 Jul 2016 #15
All she needs is to wrap up the base Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #17
Clinton. Iggo Jul 2016 #16
Likely Kaine. liberalmuse Jul 2016 #18
My gut feeling, in this order of probablity ,,,, Rosco T. Jul 2016 #19
I think it will be Warren and she's who I want. n/t Different Drummer Jul 2016 #20
Elizabeth Warren - I wish Hillary would announce it tonight. avebury Jul 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author arthritisR_US Jul 2016 #25
I want Warren. Martin O'Malley would be good rurallib Jul 2016 #27
Here is what the gang over at 538 has to say Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #29
Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka AngryAmish Jul 2016 #30
Made me laugh. Thank you. nt JanMichael Jul 2016 #45
Warren nt puffy socks Jul 2016 #32
Florida's native son Stravidis whistler162 Jul 2016 #35
I Don't Care. No one really cares about a VP pick....unless alphafemale Jul 2016 #41
Warren! ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #43
No clue. I sense misdirection but honestly I have no idea. JanMichael Jul 2016 #46
One more thought - 4 or 8 years from now who could take the reigns? JanMichael Jul 2016 #47
If she wants to blow the doors off the barn after Trump's speech last night... Miles Archer Jul 2016 #48
CNN just announced octoberlib Jul 2016 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who Do You Think Hillary'...»Reply #29