Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madville

(7,847 posts)
27. It's surprisingly tough to find employable and qualified people
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jul 2016

It compounds the problem when a large portion of job seekers are ineligible for the available opportunity. We sometimes have a hard time finding and retaining good people. Most business owners and managers I know have similar experiences across different industries. It is amazing how many people are either unemployable or can't last more than a year without getting fired.

Some examples:
- Many trades require driving a company vehicle. Many people that apply either have had a DUI in the last 5 years or don't have a drivers license for whatever reason.
- State and Federal Contracts/Bonding - Many can't pass a background check/investigation for a laundry list of reasons.
- Drug testing - Half the people we have fired are for this reason. Usually tied to or triggered by suspected theft of company property when it involves stimulants or barbiturates.
- Some just cannot handle working without close supervision, basically they need a babysitter and cannot function independently.
- Some are simply lazy or have no attention span or can't be disconnected from social media/video game for an 8 hour shift.

When we find a dedicated, responsible, experienced employee that has a clean criminal and driving record, we do everything within reason (and sometimes beyond) to keep and take care of them. There are problems with that group too though, they can easily get a job anywhere and quickly so they are harder to retain especially when they get a "the grass is greener over there" idea (which I'm guilty of myself).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fifty years ago we were speaking of the "service economy." JayhawkSD Jul 2016 #1
Well.... Adrahil Jul 2016 #2
Just to get by now ... lpbk2713 Jul 2016 #3
Wrong.... Wounded Bear Jul 2016 #4
Well, to be accurate ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2016 #40
Well surely that means the median income is dropping like a rock! whatthehey Jul 2016 #5
Did you expect anyone to take you seriously? brentspeak Jul 2016 #6
I expect people to take data more seriously than opinion pieces whatthehey Jul 2016 #7
You mean this kind of data? brentspeak Jul 2016 #8
That's only a bad thing awoke_in_2003 Jul 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #16
The 1950s 1939 Jul 2016 #19
please tell me you forgot the sarcasm emote. Either that, or I strongly suggest merrily Jul 2016 #28
Let's get it straight about productivity and higher wages. JayhawkSD Jul 2016 #25
Thanks for links. inanna Jul 2016 #17
I think you wanted this graph Angel Martin Jul 2016 #46
None of those require a college education either AwakeAtLast Jul 2016 #10
Don't get me started on this college kick JayhawkSD Jul 2016 #11
There are still trades jobs madville Jul 2016 #12
true, but there aren't nearly enough of those type of jobs; that's the whole problem. TheFrenchRazor Jul 2016 #15
It's surprisingly tough to find employable and qualified people madville Jul 2016 #27
The IBEW will take you as an apprentice, tomorrow, if you show up Recursion Jul 2016 #44
There is still a lot of nepotism in the trades, and entry level is not really entry level anymore davidn3600 Jul 2016 #38
Excellent post, thank you! inanna Jul 2016 #18
K all what you wrote still doesn't take away from the fact that this is no longe 1962... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #20
So, what? You want to start at the top? JayhawkSD Jul 2016 #23
Depends on your definition of a living wage madville Jul 2016 #33
Used to be rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #31
Understood. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2016 #34
Let's not be too hasty.... mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2016 #32
None of those jobs are trade jobs either AwakeAtLast Jul 2016 #36
I would say they don't really care one way or another The2ndWheel Jul 2016 #39
K&R Photographer Jul 2016 #13
nothing to see here folks, move along... nt TheFrenchRazor Jul 2016 #14
The purpose of capitalism is to create capital for capitalists Cresent City Kid Jul 2016 #21
Side effect? JayhawkSD Jul 2016 #24
He did Cresent City Kid Jul 2016 #30
I was shocked to find that KatyaR Jul 2016 #22
By whom? NT mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2016 #29
A $15 minimum wage edhopper Jul 2016 #26
And now, from those jumpy-smiley folks at the BLS, mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2016 #35
Another way to say is : 1/2 of the jobs created in the hottest job categories pay < $18 hr. gd770226 Jul 2016 #41
This is why Trump appeals to a lot of people. Calista241 Jul 2016 #37
Yep! vintx Jul 2016 #42
Umm.. that's roughly the median individual income, so, yeah Recursion Jul 2016 #43
5 of America's fastest growing jobs pay more than $89,000 per year mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 of America's fastest gr...»Reply #27