Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 5 of America's fastest growing jobs pay less than $25,000 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(69,217 posts)35. And now, from those jumpy-smiley folks at the BLS,
here's the source for the CNN article:
Fastest growing occupations
It lists 30 occupations. That means, that if "5 of America's fastest growing jobs pay less than $25,000," then 25 of the 30 occupations listed in the table of fastest growing occupations pay more than (or equal to) $25,000. The highest-paying of those 30 occupations is optometrist, at $103,900. The median wage for all 30 occupations is $36,200.
So, an alternative title for the CNN article is:
[font color=red]"25 of America's 30 fastest growing occupations pay at least $25,000, and in some cases, much more."[/font]
Jeepers!
I can hardly wait until the first Friday in August, when the BLS releases more swell employment data.
I think I'll watch a video until then:

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
please tell me you forgot the sarcasm emote. Either that, or I strongly suggest
merrily
Jul 2016
#28
true, but there aren't nearly enough of those type of jobs; that's the whole problem.
TheFrenchRazor
Jul 2016
#15
There is still a lot of nepotism in the trades, and entry level is not really entry level anymore
davidn3600
Jul 2016
#38
K all what you wrote still doesn't take away from the fact that this is no longe 1962...
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#20