Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ismnotwasm

(42,661 posts)

28. Whoa

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Tue Jul 26, 2016, 05:21 AM

Jul 2016

That is hands down the worst series of snopes articles I have ever read. I started opening links and the "proof" was article after article. From places like Vox ect, not bad in itself, but not "proof" of anything.

Even their cited emails weren't that impressive. I thought they found something new.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SNOPES: What We Know So Far About WikiLeaks' #DNCLeaks [View all] Hissyspit Jul 2016 OP

No one is buying it anymore. annavictorious Jul 2016 #1

No one is buying what? Hissyspit Jul 2016 #2

I don't think that was directed at you, more like the people at the convention. Rex Jul 2016 #4

Which ones, specifically? Because I've read through them, and I am seeing 2 out of 20000 that Squinch Jul 2016 #12

It's amazing JesterCS Jul 2016 #18

Deflect much? False equivalency much? merrily Jul 2016 #10

DURec - Thanks for posting this leftstreet Jul 2016 #3

Thanks, Hissyspit. It is good and clear. merrily Jul 2016 #5

sore losers, RazBerryBeret Jul 2016 #6

I saw more sore winners than sore losers and sore winners are far less explicable. merrily Jul 2016 #8

Even if it hadn't been my ox getting gored, I'd still be angry REP Jul 2016 #13

The DNC *and* the media, hand in hand, much as we've been saying all year. "Unquestionably." merrily Jul 2016 #16

In general REP Jul 2016 #21

Please don't say good things about Nixon. He was a POS. Someday, I'll do a post about why Eisenhower merrily Jul 2016 #22

Please don't misunderstand... REP Jul 2016 #33

IMO, Nixon was just as evil and maybe even nuttier, but better at concealing his evil and insanity. merrily Jul 2016 #35

Spot on merrily madokie Jul 2016 #29

Thanks so much madokie. I have not seen you in a good bit. merrily Jul 2016 #30

Yes its nice to see you again madokie Jul 2016 #31

This ↑↑ OxQQme Jul 2016 #34

Wow that is a lot of reading material, thanks Hissyspit! Rex Jul 2016 #7

Good read. Marie Marie Jul 2016 #9

Much appreciated. n/t ronnie624 Jul 2016 #11

KIck and rec Arazi Jul 2016 #14

Thanks. I was under the impression that the Russian thing was proven. hollowdweller Jul 2016 #15

Plus, comparative lack of name recognition, almost no big endorsers and raising all his money merrily Jul 2016 #19

You forgot the deliberate media blackout. Hissyspit Jul 2016 #24

I was replying to post 15, which had already specified complicit media. merrily Jul 2016 #25

Of course you were. That was the idea. Hissyspit Jul 2016 #23

Wow, just wow! panader0 Jul 2016 #17

Not that we need any more of them, but that would be a huge tell: snopes is better than politifact merrily Jul 2016 #26

Kicked and bookmarked. avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #20

Knr SammyWinstonJack Jul 2016 #27

Whoa ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #28

K&R - Outstanding summary. nt kristopher Jul 2016 #32

Yeah this. All of this. Impossible to deny this. riderinthestorm Jul 2016 #36