Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

veganlush

(2,049 posts)
20. ed's fine, we need someone who can talk to the blue
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 07:00 PM
Jun 2012

collars too, but he's not the brightest bulb in the room. He doesn't understand boycotting, he thinks it's a free speech issue and it's NOT. Free speech protections means the Government can't contain or control speech. It has nothing to do with people deciding to bring market forces to bear, through free will, in the form of a boycott.

Someone needs to explain the difference to him and others, for example Sarah Palin. It IS NOT a free speech issue. A boycott is just advertising in reverse, done by people with a point of view banding together. When Coke says buy our product instead of Pepsi, they are calling for a boycott in a manner of speaking. Free Speech issues involve the GOVERNMENT attempting to impede speech.

Boycotting Limbaugh is just a matter of members of the free market making their choices. Just like when a vegan shops for food, he's taking into account the costs that aren't reflected on the price sticker (confinement, torture of innocents) and he's voting with his wallet and boycotting cruelty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Technically, Rachel is part of the Corporate Media rox63 Jun 2012 #1
So? lunatica Jun 2012 #2
Neither rox63 Jun 2012 #3
Okay (agreed), but I still think senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #5
She deserves a lot of credit for speaking the truth rox63 Jun 2012 #9
By this I hope you mean some of the media (mainly Fox) maddiemom Jun 2012 #14
And it's good to have a Liberal voice on the "Corporate Media" Would you prefer Limbaugh, or crunch60 Jun 2012 #6
Rachel rules! rox63 Jun 2012 #8
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #21
MSMedia is corporate and govt propaganda, watch 'em kill Al-Qaeda #2! just1voice Jun 2012 #4
The MSM never reports the lies of the GOP. McCamy Taylor Jun 2012 #7
Martin Bashir, Ed Schultz and Lawrence ODonnell are also talking about Romney's lies. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #10
Yeah, love them, but why is Ed defending Limbaugh now? senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #16
I don't know why Ed is defending him. It has nothing to do with free speech and Limbaugh is so libinnyandia Jun 2012 #18
ed's fine, we need someone who can talk to the blue veganlush Jun 2012 #20
Love your reply. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #23
thank you veganlush Jun 2012 #24
been putting it on blogforiowa most of this year rurallib Jun 2012 #11
Good on ya, as Hartmann says. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #12
I love Blog for Iowa and Bleeding Heartland. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #19
Hey thanks, I really appreciate the kind words rurallib Jun 2012 #22
Mit is what is called a pathological liar. Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #13
Never mind the media - come on Smilo Jun 2012 #15
Well, that was the last sentence of my OP. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #17
David Letterman also bashes Mittens every night. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #25
Dave is awesome senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #26
He's lying right at this moment - he just said that President Obama is anti-trade. jillan Jun 2012 #27
Uh, no, Mittens, he's not anti-trade at all. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #31
I am fond of quoting Slavoj Zizek on this, and I will do it again and again: Robb Jun 2012 #28
Yikes senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #30
George Bernard Shaw said it. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #33
He's a freakin' liar flamingdem Jun 2012 #29
Andrew Sullivan is all over the meme n/t taught_me_patience Jun 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a reason only Rac...»Reply #20