Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hunter

(40,712 posts)

3. Very interesting... thanks.

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:08 PM

Aug 2016

Downside is that it might discourage automation.

I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated.

If this automation puts people ought of work, then subsidize work that is not dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, and mind numbing.

In any case, people who happen to be unemployable for any reason ought to receive a basic livable income.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Best farm subsidy idea I've ever heard [View all] Recursion Aug 2016 OP

The farmers in Iowa will not like that liberal N proud Aug 2016 #1

I wonder how many farm susidy recipients... orwell Aug 2016 #2

All of them liberal N proud Aug 2016 #11

Very interesting... thanks. hunter Aug 2016 #3

"I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated." Brickbat Aug 2016 #4

You've never had a good job? hunter Aug 2016 #5

What would those jobs look like? Brickbat Aug 2016 #6

That's not a question I can answer for anyone else. hunter Aug 2016 #7

Many people find fulfillment in work that others consider dangersous, damaging to the Brickbat Aug 2016 #10

Subsidizing healthy food PatSeg Aug 2016 #8

USDA used to pay some "farmers" to NOT grow crops csziggy Aug 2016 #9

Yes, they still do. Dash Riprock Aug 2016 #12