Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

csziggy

(34,189 posts)
9. USDA used to pay some "farmers" to NOT grow crops
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:58 PM
Aug 2016

Back when I first got my farm there were some subsidies devoted to paying land owners to not grow a crop. I believe it was for some things that were in too abundant a supply so rather than buying up surpluses, the government would simply pay the land owners to leave their land fallow. Some pieces of land had not grown any crops for years, but the subsidies kept coming.

Of course, that meant the money didn't circulate the way it would have if something was actually being grown - money for seed, fertilizer, fuel, labor, etc. just wasn't spent they way it would have if a crop were grown, harvested and marketed. Instead money went straight into land owners' pockets and didn't get spread around the community.

I'm not sure if that kind of subsidy is still done. I've never taken a subsidy like that. The only government assistance I accepted on my farm was help building a wildlife pond down in our woods and advice on managing our trees - which was to just let them grow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Best farm subsidy idea I'...»Reply #9