Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Else You Are Mad (Reply #73)

"The highest level detected was 18.74 parts per billion (ppb)" MohRokTah Aug 2016 #1
I doubt a concern merely voiced is equivalent to the melodrama of a falling sky LanternWaste Aug 2016 #8
Some people PatSeg Aug 2016 #21
I really don't want to eat or drink anything carcinogenic womanofthehills Aug 2016 #13
Then you will starve and dehydrate. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #14
Actually the Cancer Research Division of the World Health Organization disagrees with you womanofthehills Aug 2016 #38
And low and behold, you made a claim and didn't back it up. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #39
Look it up - we have been discusssing this forever womanofthehills Aug 2016 #41
I'm not doing your work for you. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #42
what about the scientific american link downthread? did you read that? Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #44
Check the video below from ABC news - it backs up my claim womanofthehills Aug 2016 #55
What video below? Link to it. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #57
post 48 womanofthehills Aug 2016 #67
No video in post 48. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #71
The alleged logic in your statement is illogical. HERVEPA Aug 2016 #182
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #193
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #45
You literally cannot avoid consuming or breathing carcinogens. trotsky Aug 2016 #235
Parts per trillion or billion... Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #29
BEcaue there are carcinogens in larger quantities in everything you put in your mouth. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #46
But, I can control when I drink alcohol. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #59
Wrong. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #70
I shouldn't have to worry about that... Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #77
But all of those have been well regulated... Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #83
So put alcohol and glyphosate together womanofthehills Aug 2016 #58
Well. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #50
Then you cannot eat or drink ANYTHING. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #54
You are missing the point. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #60
Actually, you are missing the point MohRokTah Aug 2016 #62
No, I was saying I have no problem consuming known carcinogens. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #64
Actually, it had even more man made toxic chemicals. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #68
WARNING: Only eat organic when on antibiotics - glyphosate equals antiobiotic resistance womanofthehills Aug 2016 #66
That is a very disturbing article PatSeg Aug 2016 #100
is the organic food grown in a greenhouse? Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #102
Uh, no. Roundup does not directly negate antibiotics. kestrel91316 Aug 2016 #134
That is really disturbing PatSeg Aug 2016 #152
We would all benefit from a link to your source Orrex Aug 2016 #190
Try Google, over 400,000 results PatSeg Aug 2016 #195
I'm just making reference to an article cited and linked to upthread. kestrel91316 Aug 2016 #246
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #56
Wrong. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #72
Ok, ignoring wine... Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #79
So, my kid drinking grape juice... Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #84
That is a non answer. Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #91
So, I should just accept it? Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #93
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #94
Some of the chemicals found in grapes by USDA - they test for all these pesticides womanofthehills Aug 2016 #137
The EPA does not test grapes or any foods for glyphosate yet womanofthehills Aug 2016 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #114
Scientists now saying no safe level of glyphosate in your body womanofthehills Aug 2016 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #61
All the tolerances for residues in foods are in parts per million on EPA table womanofthehills Aug 2016 #110
What is the safe level in your opinion? n/t pnwmom Aug 2016 #226
Ever take care of a person dying from cancer in a home hospice program? Peregrine Took Aug 2016 #252
Yes PatSeg Aug 2016 #253
And...the GMO-glyphosate tragedy-shitstorm is intensifying RapSoDee Aug 2016 #2
Nature has a way PatSeg Aug 2016 #5
You know PatSeg Aug 2016 #6
Because of the superweeds Monsanto's toxic herbicide - DICAMBA to the rescue womanofthehills Aug 2016 #25
I was just reading about "dicamba" PatSeg Aug 2016 #74
No crop is "fundamentally dependent" on glyphosate. Give me a break. jmowreader Aug 2016 #138
Non-GMO soybeans offer high yields at lower cost PatSeg Aug 2016 #154
A study by Mom's Across America? Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #3
I have never followed Mercola PatSeg Aug 2016 #7
Don Huber is a quack who writes for quack site Mercola. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #9
Everyone has an opinion PatSeg Aug 2016 #10
I know. I don't understand why you keep doing that, though. nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #16
Oh, I'm quite sure that you do understand PatSeg Aug 2016 #19
Yes, I believe it promoting science and fact. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #125
Projection again and again womanofthehills Aug 2016 #133
Have you seen your posts? Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #146
They are 99% backed up by facts womanofthehills Aug 2016 #163
No, they are not. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #170
FACT - Roundup is a possible carcinogen womanofthehills Aug 2016 #172
See that word there? "Possible". Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #174
Fact PatSeg Aug 2016 #176
Science has come a LONG way since the 1950s, Scooter. nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #183
And there is no END Spanky PatSeg Aug 2016 #186
Of course there's no end. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #189
I very clearly added to the op: PatSeg Aug 2016 #197
When the WHO says possible it's just like saying it is womanofthehills Aug 2016 #196
The WHO says it is likely not harmful. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #202
... NuclearDem Aug 2016 #18
Ha! nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #126
Actually, I just got this information about EPA meeting from the great site "Moms Across America" womanofthehills Aug 2016 #11
"Great site" Orrex Aug 2016 #12
Completely unashamed to promote debunked bullshit. nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #17
So how is a chart sourced from the EPA debunked bullshit? womanofthehills Aug 2016 #135
Yes, activist moms fighting GMO's womanofthehills Aug 2016 #131
Yes yes, I know. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #15
Actually, I have rarely checked Mom's Across America but I think I now will womanofthehills Aug 2016 #43
You keep racing to the bottom! nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #124
Your posts never have any information womanofthehills Aug 2016 #165
Neither do yours. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #167
Give me a link saying Roundup is safe for our bodies, babies and the environment. womanofthehills Aug 2016 #173
There ya go. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #175
I don't think it was that black and white PatSeg Aug 2016 #177
Nothing is black and white. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #184
Above link NOT a study but a PANEL- Reuters misleadingly reported stroy womanofthehills Aug 2016 #199
ALCOA! Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #200
Actually, Dr. Hobbitsein - your link has been tainted by Monsanto insiders & money womanofthehills Aug 2016 #201
Yes, it's all a big conspiracy! Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #204
You're really on a roll today PatSeg Aug 2016 #254
Wow - here a GREAT VIDEO I found on Mom's Across America RELATING TO OP womanofthehills Aug 2016 #49
GREAT. You keep saying that word. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #123
Your posts are very familiar womanofthehills Aug 2016 #168
No, but I'm glad I'm not the only one on this site willing to call you out on the bullshit that you Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #169
Very interesting PatSeg Aug 2016 #20
That's a childish objection Orrex Aug 2016 #23
Well PatSeg Aug 2016 #27
Forgive me, but that has nothing to do with the organization's name Orrex Aug 2016 #65
Those poor "unscientific" activist moms are now reporting glyphosate in their breast milk - womanofthehills Aug 2016 #171
Warning: These "Moms" might not be scientists!!! PatSeg Aug 2016 #179
Who called anyone "ignorant unscientific moms?" Certainly not me. Orrex Aug 2016 #180
Who buys most of the groceries? womanofthehills Aug 2016 #26
Yes PatSeg Aug 2016 #34
Oh good lord, that's just dumb. NuclearDem Aug 2016 #47
Moms Across America is not a shit site - it's a site of WOMEN ACTIVISTS womanofthehills Aug 2016 #51
No, it's a site of idiots who claim to have "concerns" about non existant things. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #127
So according to you GLYPHOSATE IN BREAST MILK is a concern about something non existant. womanofthehills Aug 2016 #178
Yes, it's a non existant concern. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #181
That is really good news PatSeg Aug 2016 #192
Actually, Monsanto did the tests saying no glyphosate in breast milk womanofthehills Aug 2016 #220
Now that is really intersting PatSeg Aug 2016 #222
Slack Science Destroys Monsanto Breast Milk Study womanofthehills Aug 2016 #239
ALSO, Monsanto won't say when or where they got the breast milk womanofthehills Aug 2016 #240
It is so exhausting PatSeg Aug 2016 #241
No shit. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #231
But you seem to think profanity marks you as smart. closeupready Aug 2016 #247
. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #249
Thanks PatSeg Aug 2016 #255
Actually German studies find glyphosate in breast milk - unlike the Monsanto lab tests womanofthehills Aug 2016 #215
+1 PatSeg Aug 2016 #223
Yes, I know. You hate science. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #229
Actually, it's beautiful up here - it's our monsoon season womanofthehills Aug 2016 #244
Well, at least you admit you live up there on Bullshit Mountain. nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #251
Sigh PatSeg Aug 2016 #256
Women activists who don't fucking understand basic science, maybe. LeftyMom Aug 2016 #140
More hyperbole PatSeg Aug 2016 #86
Oh, beg your pardon, you're right. NuclearDem Aug 2016 #95
Still putting words in my mouth PatSeg Aug 2016 #101
Oh good lord, just own it already. NuclearDem Aug 2016 #104
I see a lot of "hilariously transparent" PatSeg Aug 2016 #106
It's not a fringe anti-science group - it's a mom's activist group fighting GMO's womanofthehills Aug 2016 #132
Mercola shill site says what?...nt SidDithers Aug 2016 #4
well we wouldn't want broad leaf weeds growing in our wine GreatGazoo Aug 2016 #22
what about scientific american? are they quacks? or rubes? Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #24
What is disturbing PatSeg Aug 2016 #31
am waiting for the ones here who claim to know what they're talking about deal with it. Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #35
There is so much corporate money PatSeg Aug 2016 #85
It is disturbing - hopefully the EPA will do better in their Oct Roundup evaluation womanofthehills Aug 2016 #75
Many herbicides and pesticides won't work without the toxic "inerts" womanofthehills Aug 2016 #36
thank you. what about the statement that says the inerts are NOT inert? Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #40
Agreed - I would say "inert" is pharma talk womanofthehills Aug 2016 #78
Which scientists? stevil Aug 2016 #103
Scientific American is a pop-sci magazine. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #128
Yeah PatSeg Aug 2016 #136
Yes, and my grandmother submitted an article in a medical magazine about my grandfather's... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #144
And I know a lot of people who submit PatSeg Aug 2016 #147
Have any of them claimed to be scientists doing independent research? No, so your point is... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #216
It's not peer-reviewed science, however. nt Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #145
"Peer-reviewed" PatSeg Aug 2016 #148
Oh, I know damn well what it means. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #149
Nothing is infallible PatSeg Aug 2016 #151
That's what the peer review process is for. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #153
New Peer-reviewed Paper's Bold Statement PatSeg Aug 2016 #155
March Against Monsanto and GMWatch. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #156
I knew you were going to do that PatSeg Aug 2016 #157
You keep posting bullshit from psuedo-science sites. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #159
You still have not PatSeg Aug 2016 #162
He was NOT vindicated. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #166
We can't have a meaningful discussion PatSeg Aug 2016 #185
We can't have a meaninful discussion about science because you REFUSE to post links Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #187
That would be true PatSeg Aug 2016 #191
Cocaine was found on 100% of US paper money Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #28
Who eats money? PatSeg Aug 2016 #32
You don't get it. It's not about destinations, it's about sources. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #33
Hey, wait! The Gish-galloping "I drink a glass of glyphosphate every day" guys haven't gotten Squinch Aug 2016 #30
"Gish-galloping" PatSeg Aug 2016 #90
Oh, you mean the people that understand science. Bonx Aug 2016 #96
Oh, I think he means PatSeg Aug 2016 #105
Are you sure? His post is cryptic. I'll stay with my position. Bonx Aug 2016 #113
As you wish PatSeg Aug 2016 #116
I've essentially stopped buying California wines. closeupready Aug 2016 #48
Uranium??? Damn, I should either be 40 feet tall, or have super powers by now!!!! JoePhilly Aug 2016 #80
What about all the cesium from Fukashimi womanofthehills Aug 2016 #92
Shrink, Grow, Invisibility ... give me SOMETHING!!! JoePhilly Aug 2016 #97
I'm levitating right now! ;) Starry Messenger Aug 2016 #111
The risk is chemical, not nuclear. Igel Aug 2016 #130
Sadly, even organic wines are testing for glyphosate but at lower levels womanofthehills Aug 2016 #88
Darn Moms! PatSeg Aug 2016 #89
Yes, very scientific (sarcasm, if needed). BeeBee Aug 2016 #98
Could you please cite some sources. n/t BeeBee Aug 2016 #99
WHO Publishes Full Probable Human Carcinogen Report on Glyphosate womanofthehills Aug 2016 #112
My question was to closeupready... BeeBee Aug 2016 #115
Odd concerns in a hepatoxic carcinogen you ingest daily. LeftyMom Aug 2016 #141
k&r nationalize the fed Aug 2016 #108
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #109
And when no one will take their bait PatSeg Aug 2016 #117
Congratulations! NuclearDem Aug 2016 #118
I rest my case. Prisoner_Number_Six Aug 2016 #120
Okay, whatever you say. NuclearDem Aug 2016 #121
A man of few words PatSeg Aug 2016 #122
This message was self-deleted by its author Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #129
Tips to distinguish turf from truth PatSeg Aug 2016 #119
Honestly, how are we supposed to take such websites as that seriously when they... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #142
Nice diversion there PatSeg Aug 2016 #158
Oh, you mean the page that basically says, "if we are called out its SHILLS!" I thought that... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #206
Wait, I'm curious PatSeg Aug 2016 #209
9 times out of 10 its crazy assed conspiracies, the fact is that... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #211
You know PatSeg Aug 2016 #217
Really? Then why do you deny basic scientific facts? Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #218
I think you must be confusing me PatSeg Aug 2016 #221
Sorry, I have a tendancy to lump all science deniers together, their positions seem to... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #225
Sorry PatSeg Aug 2016 #227
Its difficult to not condescend considering the quality of the sources you use. Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #232
If you absolutely must have the last word PatSeg Aug 2016 #238
Okay Pat, riddle me this... jmowreader Aug 2016 #139
What would organic farmers PatSeg Aug 2016 #150
Have you ever BEEN to a vineyard? sendero Aug 2016 #161
If they'd actually read PatSeg Aug 2016 #164
Do you know what parts per billion are? jmowreader Aug 2016 #188
Like lead in drinking water? PatSeg Aug 2016 #210
First things first, the effects of lead poisoning are well known, along with what are... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #214
The problem with using words like "known" PatSeg Aug 2016 #219
Glyphosate has been widely used for about 2 generations now, if there were adverse effects... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #224
FALSE - CDC says cancer on rise 24% in MEN, 21% in woman womanofthehills Aug 2016 #230
It certainly feels like PatSeg Aug 2016 #234
Cancer is inevitable Loki Liesmith Aug 2016 #242
Did you even read the link? It says incidences will stay the same... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #250
Don't lower yourself to their level, while people like Vani Hari are unethical people... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #212
We get it - woman activists are not your thing womanofthehills Aug 2016 #233
Scientifically-illiterate morons are not limited to one gender. NuclearDem Aug 2016 #236
So lets see, Food Babe is a "scientifically-illiterate moron" because she is getting GMO's, womanofthehills Aug 2016 #243
No, she's a scientifically-illiterate moron NuclearDem Aug 2016 #248
Propogating ignorance isn't my thing, the gender of the person... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #245
Riddle me this - answers womanofthehills Aug 2016 #228
Revolving doors PatSeg Aug 2016 #237
Oh look, an anti-vaxxer site... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #143
You must be thinking someone else PatSeg Aug 2016 #160
Uhm, its literally an anti-vaxxer site that claims that there is a link between Baby Tylenol... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #205
Beyond Stupid. Article just throws numbers around. Measures beer in μg/L and wine in ppb. WTF? RAFisher Aug 2016 #194
The beer tests were from Germany PatSeg Aug 2016 #198
Nothing like a big glass of Roundup to end the day! workinclasszero Aug 2016 #203
And you could always follow it PatSeg Aug 2016 #207
Yeah, how about that? workinclasszero Aug 2016 #208
Now and then PatSeg Aug 2016 #213
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roundup’s Glyphosate, Fou...»Reply #77