Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How (the NRA helped) a Secretive Branch of ISIS Build a Global Network of Killers that is [View all]jmg257
(11,996 posts)16. Since so many cities know the <1% reponsible, there are effective solutions.
"Only recently, Richmond, Calif., had among Americas highest per capita rates of gun violence. In 2009, there were 47 homicides among 100,000 residents. Officials there theorized that a few bad actors caused most of the problem. As it turned out, 70 percent of their gun violence in 2008 was caused by fewer than 1 percent of the citys residents. This isnt unique: in Cincinnati, less than 1 percent of the citys population was responsible for 74 percent of homicides in 2007.
Richmond developed an innovative, controversial program: They identified the 50 people most likely to shoot someone and engaged with them, even paying them to participate.
The city provided career help, training, resume writing and health care. It asked people what they feared and helped them create plans to mitigate those fears.
Critics called it paying gang members not to shoot people. It was more than that. And it worked.
From 2007 to 2012, the city experienced a 61 percent reduction in homicides. It turned out that the money was nowhere near as important as people had thought people still show up to the meetings even though no one is paying them anymore. The interventions steered potential killers onto a better path."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/14/forget-new-gun-laws-heres-what-could-really-keep-people-from-shooting-each-other/
Also has some stats on "demographics" on who is "using guns" to commit violence.
Similarly, Chicago has a list with 1400 people responsible for 70-80% of the gun violence. "They just need the state legislators and juducial partners to hold them responsible.".
"In a city of 2.7 million people, about 1,400 are responsible for much of the violence, Mr. Johnson said, and all of them are on what the department calls its Strategic Subject List.
So far this year, more than 70 percent of the people who have been shot in Chicago were on the list, according to the police, as were more than 80 percent of those arrested in connection with shootings."
We are targeting the correct individuals, Mr. Johnson said. We just need our judicial partners and our state legislators to hold these people accountable.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How (the NRA helped) a Secretive Branch of ISIS Build a Global Network of Killers that is [View all]
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
OP
Yes of course I'm proposing a complete guns ban. The Constitution is a fluid document that
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
#5
The claim that the NRA isn't responsible for gun violence is complete nonsense.
Exilednight
Aug 2016
#29
What's more important? Votes or lives? Profiteering from irrational fear that ultimately costs
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
#9
That might be your specific demographic, but that's not the main demographic of people
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
#15
No need for a door to door search. Follow the successful examples of the country
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
#21
I think you'll find it was the rest of the '94 Crime Bill that made the impact...more police, more
jmg257
Aug 2016
#25
That interview with Rachel by the former wannabe ISIS guy is a 5 minute attack ad against the NRA
glennward
Aug 2016
#17
"Will media actually report on it." If the "story" is remotely anti-2A it rarely passes it up.
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#27
Umm, where is "the NRA helped" in all this? Why is this in GD? We have two (2) gun groups...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#26