Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
16. Since so many cities know the <1% reponsible, there are effective solutions.
Thu Aug 4, 2016, 04:07 AM
Aug 2016

"Only recently, Richmond, Calif., had among America’s highest per capita rates of gun violence. In 2009, there were 47 homicides among 100,000 residents. Officials there theorized that a few bad actors caused most of the problem. As it turned out, 70 percent of their gun violence in 2008 was caused by fewer than 1 percent of the city’s residents. This isn’t unique: in Cincinnati, less than 1 percent of the city’s population was responsible for 74 percent of homicides in 2007.

Richmond developed an innovative, controversial program: They identified the 50 people most likely to shoot someone and engaged with them, even paying them to participate.

The city provided career help, training, resume writing and health care. It asked people what they feared and helped them create plans to mitigate those fears.

Critics called it “paying gang members not to shoot people.” It was more than that. And it worked.

From 2007 to 2012, the city experienced a 61 percent reduction in homicides. It turned out that the money was nowhere near as important as people had thought — people still show up to the meetings even though no one is paying them anymore. The interventions steered potential killers onto a better path."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/14/forget-new-gun-laws-heres-what-could-really-keep-people-from-shooting-each-other/

Also has some stats on "demographics" on who is "using guns" to commit violence.

Similarly, Chicago has a list with 1400 people responsible for 70-80% of the gun violence. "They just need the state legislators and juducial partners to hold them responsible.".


"In a city of 2.7 million people, about 1,400 are responsible for much of the violence, Mr. Johnson said, and all of them are on what the department calls its Strategic Subject List.

So far this year, more than 70 percent of the people who have been shot in Chicago were on the list, according to the police, as were more than 80 percent of those arrested in connection with shootings."

“We are targeting the correct individuals,” Mr. Johnson said. “We just need our judicial partners and our state legislators to hold these people accountable.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html
I'm waiting for the first pro 2nder to come along and tell us Exilednight Aug 2016 #1
I'm pro-Constitution TeddyR Aug 2016 #2
Yes of course I'm proposing a complete guns ban. The Constitution is a fluid document that underahedgerow Aug 2016 #5
Thanks for responding TeddyR Aug 2016 #7
The claim that the NRA isn't responsible for gun violence is complete nonsense. Exilednight Aug 2016 #29
Like a computer hacker... Beartracks Aug 2016 #3
Huh? JonathanRackham Aug 2016 #4
Shh... you are not supposed to notice sarisataka Aug 2016 #11
Kick and rec for future reference. Old and In the Way Aug 2016 #6
Good grief! Abq_Sarah Aug 2016 #8
What's more important? Votes or lives? Profiteering from irrational fear that ultimately costs underahedgerow Aug 2016 #9
Lesser educated? Abq_Sarah Aug 2016 #13
Excellent post.. virginia mountainman Aug 2016 #14
That might be your specific demographic, but that's not the main demographic of people underahedgerow Aug 2016 #15
Since so many cities know the <1% reponsible, there are effective solutions. jmg257 Aug 2016 #16
That's a really fascinating narrative! Great information, so thanks! underahedgerow Aug 2016 #18
No worries...programs that work, and often in a positive way! jmg257 Aug 2016 #23
Can we also end the prohibition on warrantless searches as well? FrodosPet Aug 2016 #20
No need for a door to door search. Follow the successful examples of the country underahedgerow Aug 2016 #21
I think you'll find it was the rest of the '94 Crime Bill that made the impact...more police, more jmg257 Aug 2016 #25
Now there's a stretch.... pipoman Aug 2016 #10
k&R... spanone Aug 2016 #12
That interview with Rachel by the former wannabe ISIS guy is a 5 minute attack ad against the NRA glennward Aug 2016 #17
saw the end of that.....pretty sad and scary, yes? Gabi Hayes Aug 2016 #19
"Will media actually report on it." If the "story" is remotely anti-2A it rarely passes it up. Eleanors38 Aug 2016 #27
best idea I have is to keep my rights, and stay progressive on the 2A ileus Aug 2016 #22
After flying into Germany one time I was not avebury Aug 2016 #24
Umm, where is "the NRA helped" in all this? Why is this in GD? We have two (2) gun groups... Eleanors38 Aug 2016 #26
Nothing like knowing ISIS will be infiltrating the US to commit attacks to make jmg257 Aug 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How (the NRA helped) a Se...»Reply #16