Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(114,904 posts)

4. It's so difficult to grapple with that. But I agree. There isn't.

Wed Aug 10, 2016, 06:37 AM

Aug 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The stories we aren't talking about: Aleppo. [View all] cali Aug 2016 OP

It's a humanitarian crisis, and Ilsa Aug 2016 #1

the U.S. gov knows... Javaman Aug 2016 #20

bomb and avoid appears to be the strategy nt geek tragedy Aug 2016 #7

over there SheriffBob Aug 2016 #2

Syria is the worst case scenario for a civil war. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #3

there's only one solution, and no one is talking about it--partition geek tragedy Aug 2016 #6

was being ironic when talking about how well the Libyans have things geek tragedy Aug 2016 #14

ah, my apologies for missing that. duh for me. cali Aug 2016 #15

no prob nt geek tragedy Aug 2016 #16

I'm not sure I agree about partitioning. Ilsa Aug 2016 #10

because Leviathan is dead nt geek tragedy Aug 2016 #11

Our own civil war... Blanks Aug 2016 #13

I don't think partition would help; the divisions aren't really regional muriel_volestrangler Aug 2016 #17

a redrawn map with physical boundaries really is the only option though. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #18

Syria was stable until there were protests. Igel Aug 2016 #21