Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DEA Rejects Attempt To Loosen Federal Restrictions On Marijuana [View all]SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)54. Interesting article in High Times
Regarding the legal framework of declassifying marijuana. The author's take is basically that the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) which provides the framework for the DEA in this matter, lacks the teeth to be able to make the change and instead offers a non-challengeable way to keep turning down requests to reclassify.
Nonetheless, the decision not to reschedule marijuana is good news for the marijuana reform movement as it utterly discredits the use of the CSA as a regulatory model for cannabis and sends a clear signal to Congress that new legislation is needed to legalize and regulate marijuana in the United States.
The CSA serves to provide a regulatory framework for proprietary pharmaceutical drugs, which, because of their abuse potential, have a risk of being diverted from regulated to unregulated markets. The CSA can only be effective for drugs with two characteristics: they are manufactured by pharmaceutical companies with limited and easily monitored production, and they are subject to rigorous and capital-extensive clinical studies under supervision of the Food and Drug Administration.
Marijuana does not have these characteristics, and this is why it will not be removed from Schedule I of the CSA by the DEA.
snip//
To many, this creates an obvious paradoxbecause the drug doesnt fit the conventional form of a pharmaceutical drug and is widely accepted and used by the public as an effective drug, it cant be recognized as a drug under the standards embedded in the Controlled Substances Act by Congress. The problem here is not with marijuana, nor with the decisions made by the public, but instead with the standards created by Congress.
Thus, the only remedy to this conflict is for Congress to remove marijuana from the CSA and regulate it via more appropriate legislation.
NSFW link to High Times (I only get it for the articles, I don't look at the pictures
http://hightimes.com/culture/pot-matters-inside-the-deas-latest-refusal-to-reschedule-marijuana-pt-1/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DEA Rejects Attempt To Loosen Federal Restrictions On Marijuana [View all]
babylonsister
Aug 2016
OP
Like all bureaucratic entities: Once you establish your fiefdom, you struggle to maintain funding.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2016
#63
Wouldn't the federal government bring in more tax money on the sale of Marajuana?
yeoman6987
Aug 2016
#8
it could potentially... HOWEVER, the DEA is only concerned about maintaining the status quo...
Raster
Aug 2016
#10
it's not 'sneaking' anything. People get medical benefit from it AND people should be able to
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#31
I think the moral point was that one could easily argue to voters that sticking
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#44
Hence the campaign to sneak cannabis into use as a poorly regulated medicine
bluedye33139
Aug 2016
#48
Her position is that there should be "more research" on marijuana before anything
Chakab
Aug 2016
#17
Fuck the DEA, their own people say it is a horrible organization that needs to go away.
Rex
Aug 2016
#18
When there own top folks quit and turn against then to the point of advocating how to hide drugs
Rex
Aug 2016
#23
How likely is it to gain an accepted medical use if it remains enforced by the DEA
Johonny
Aug 2016
#26
there are multiple ways to reschedule or deschedule it. Congress can do it, the executive can do it
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#27
I think if CA legalizes, that alone will force some kind of change. I hope.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#43
they also say it has "no safety level". BULLSHIT. DEA jude Francis Young, 1988:
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#29
He's also the one appointing these agency heads that have policy positions that are totally contrary
Chakab
Aug 2016
#47
"no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States,"
nationalize the fed
Aug 2016
#38
Surprise, administration that gets loads of funding for prohibition wants it to stay.
joshcryer
Aug 2016
#41
Yeah, I read recently that the last year of alcohol prohibition saw as many raids and arrests as all
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#68
What do you want to do, take profits away from the Prison Industrial Complex?
Oneironaut
Aug 2016
#60