Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

red dog 1

(33,471 posts)

3. Sorry, I don't follow your logic

Reply to True Dough (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 12, 2016, 04:48 PM

Aug 2016

Obama trying to get his Supreme Court nominee approved has absolutely nothing to do with his wanting to get the TPP passed during the lame duck session.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Petition To Hillary Clinton: "Ask White House To Stop Pushing For 'Lame Duck' TPP Vote in Congress" [View all] red dog 1 Aug 2016 OP

There's a petition I won't sign. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #1

Obama is making the case the the Senate should affirm Merrick Garland True Dough Aug 2016 #2

Sorry, I don't follow your logic red dog 1 Aug 2016 #3

Why would you say a "lame duck" president has the right to advance True Dough Aug 2016 #4

I never said Obama doesn't "have the right" to "advance" a lame duck TPP vote red dog 1 Aug 2016 #5

I'm curious True Dough Aug 2016 #6

Who cares why? red dog 1 Aug 2016 #8

That's a pretty shallow response! True Dough Aug 2016 #9

wouldn't it be better to contact congress and get others in their district or state to oppose it ? JI7 Aug 2016 #7