Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stan Kroenke tells hundreds of fixed income residents in Texas to get off his newly-bought land [View all]linuxman
(2,337 posts)33. Precedent and history are fine factors in decision making.
That said, doing something like sinking your life savings into building a home on land that MIGHT (it eventually did) go away is foolish in the extreme. I've been alive my whole life. Every day I wake up, draw breath, go to bed, then do it all again the next day. I've never known any other outcome to my day-to-day life. I still have a will, though. Just because something has been a certain way for many years is no reason to bank on it being that way forever, especially if it remaining the same depends on the actions of other people (the owner's family keeping the land, or someone not hitting me with a car tomorrow afternoon)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stan Kroenke tells hundreds of fixed income residents in Texas to get off his newly-bought land [View all]
modem77
Aug 2016
OP
Well, the bundy bunch wants to do the same thing; graze their herds and animals for free
underahedgerow
Aug 2016
#59
No, it's moronic to sink your life saving into building a house on land you don't own.
linuxman
Aug 2016
#8
Eminent domain stipulates that you're compensated with fair market value for the land & structures
linuxman
Aug 2016
#35
the more popular sentiment being rationalized is simply screw the idiots who built on the land
LanternWaste
Aug 2016
#64
Capitalist pigs like Kroenke can go fuck themselves, and fuck their "property".
Odin2005
Aug 2016
#39
He will probably develop it into hotels and strip malls or some way for him to make money.
modem77
Aug 2016
#47
A better way would have been for Krinkle-Krisp to purchase development rights...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#49
Worthless piece of shit screwing over people, you don't say, BTW, I'm a St. Louisan, fuck this...
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2016
#38
Don't see how that would apply since Kroenke just bought the property in February.
WillowTree
Aug 2016
#57