Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama has now delivered a third body blow to the war on drugs [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)9. Yes, people of color should be grateful, their prisons cells will be upgraded.
The people with money are doing all they can, you see.
Michelle Alexander: White Men Get Rich from Legal Pot, Black Men Stay in Prison
For 40 years, poor communities of color have experienced the wrath of the war on drugs.
But the ramifications of this momentous shift are left unaddressed. When you flick on the TV to a segment about the flowering pot market in Colorado, you'll find that the faces of the movement are primarily white and male. Meanwhile, many of the more than 210,000 people who were arrested for marijuana possession in Colorado between 1986 and 2010 according to a report from the Marijuana Arrest Research Project, remain behind bars. Thousands of black men and boys still sit in prisons for possession of the very plant that's making those white guys on TV rich.
In many ways the imagery doesn't sit right, said Michelle Alexander, associate professor of law at Ohio State University and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness in a public conversation on March 6 with Asha Bandele of the Drug Policy Alliance. Here are white men poised to run big marijuana businesses, dreaming of cashing in bigbig money, big businesses selling weedafter 40 years of impoverished black kids getting prison time for selling weed, and their families and futures destroyed. Now, white men are planning to get rich doing precisely the same thing?
...
For 40 years, poor communities of color have experienced the wrath of the war on drugs.
But the ramifications of this momentous shift are left unaddressed. When you flick on the TV to a segment about the flowering pot market in Colorado, you'll find that the faces of the movement are primarily white and male. Meanwhile, many of the more than 210,000 people who were arrested for marijuana possession in Colorado between 1986 and 2010 according to a report from the Marijuana Arrest Research Project, remain behind bars. Thousands of black men and boys still sit in prisons for possession of the very plant that's making those white guys on TV rich.
In many ways the imagery doesn't sit right, said Michelle Alexander, associate professor of law at Ohio State University and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness in a public conversation on March 6 with Asha Bandele of the Drug Policy Alliance. Here are white men poised to run big marijuana businesses, dreaming of cashing in bigbig money, big businesses selling weedafter 40 years of impoverished black kids getting prison time for selling weed, and their families and futures destroyed. Now, white men are planning to get rich doing precisely the same thing?
...
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/michelle-alexander-white-men-get-rich-legal-pot-black-men-stay-prison
...
A few days later, the corner is empty. The reason is a Ford SUV, painted black, blue, and white, idling at the curb a few feet away; a police officers arm hangs out the window as he surveys the faces passing by. A few hours later he is gone, and the crowd is back. Mostly, the crowd is black. Mostly, the cops who will bust them are white. Mostly, on the corner its hard to see how anything was changed by a movement that aimed to change everything.
The dream of legal marijuana as it is being sold to the American public is that it will not only give states a chance to reap a tax windfall off of a drug millions of Americans already use; it will end the back-and-forth tussle among cops, users, and dealers, and shift police resources to more serious crimes. Most compellingly, advocates hold out the promise of a major step toward dismantling one of the pillars of racially biased policingthe war on drugsand finally reeling in a legal net that has long entangled black men at vastly disproportionate rates.
Proponents of legalization make this case explicitly. In factsheets and reports, the American Civil Liberties Union describes marijuana laws as generating staggering racial bias. And the statistics do paint a stark picture: Although whites are as likely to use marijuana as blacks, nationally black people are almost four times more likely to be arrested for possessing the drug. In some states, its closer to nine times. Those arrests in turn show up on background checks for everything from apartments to jobs, and despite the courts presumption of innocence, arrests are often treated by society as de facto markers of guilt. So in one fell swoop, voters are told, they can balance government budgets, begin to close a pipeline that sends one in three black men to prison, and free up the cops to chase real criminals. Plus, now its legal to get stoned.
...
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/michelle-alexander-white-men-get-rich-legal-pot-black-men-stay-prison
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, the Speaker of the House for MA is Robert DeLeo (D). What's his take on legalization?
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#25
The problem as I see it is that MJ remains illegal, and as such that illegality remains as a tool
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#73
Again, lots of "great moves" espoused on campaign trails. Let's see what the actual policy
villager
Aug 2016
#33
You'd think. Though that didn't keep us out of Iraq, or give us a public option
villager
Aug 2016
#41
Actually a change from Sched I to II is really cosmetic, wouldn't change much.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#42
The change would still be a "ratcheting down," though thanks for posting that link
villager
Aug 2016
#43
Yeah, it's a step in the right direction, and I'm glad our party is at least starting to show
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#46
Tell it to the millions of people negatively effected by the war on America (Drugs)
Taitertots
Aug 2016
#2
Maybe.....just maybe....that is being planned for...let's say...after, yes after the election
Stuart G
Aug 2016
#16
The last round of pardons I saw on the interwebs was all people with crack convictions
AllyCat
Aug 2016
#51
Thank you, President Obama, however many steps you take! Another lesson to your detractors.
ancianita
Aug 2016
#15
yeah, that's messed up, and it's also fucked that Obama has just pardoned a precious handful
Fast Walker 52
Aug 2016
#60