Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
2. Um no...
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:42 AM
Jun 2012

There are plenty of things wrong with the Stand your Ground law. Not the least of which is the fact that studies have shown *gasp* that a minorities are less likely to be believed if they invoke it and it is much more likely to be used against them whether they are a real threat or not and if the person using the defense is white wow suddenly it becomes a more believable defense. Secondly it is a poorly written law. But, it is not so poorly written that any reasonable person could read it as legalized dueling in the scenario you have presented.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Your post clearly indicates you have *ZERO* knowledge of 'stand your ground'. Edweird Jun 2012 #1
Um no... Kalidurga Jun 2012 #2
Sir, there are some holes in your interpretation Meiko Jun 2012 #3
It's worse than that - it's legalized murder. baldguy Jun 2012 #4
There are some pretty strong messages here for Meiko Jun 2012 #5
One can plan the perfect crime of murder. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #6
You don't need SYG to do that. hack89 Jun 2012 #8
The problem is that safeinOhio Jun 2012 #9
Prosecutors routinely refuse to indict for self defense shootings hack89 Jun 2012 #10
They can't if they don't investigate the killing of safeinOhio Jun 2012 #11
So it is all about race? hack89 Jun 2012 #12
There are those that want to see it turned into a racial issue Meiko Jun 2012 #14
It's very effective for ending any real discussion hack89 Jun 2012 #15
Starting to look a lot like it. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #16
Considering the racists roots of gun control laws in the first place hack89 Jun 2012 #17
Minorities of the large major cities safeinOhio Jun 2012 #19
Unfortunately for them hack89 Jun 2012 #20
I'm sure you and others always safeinOhio Jun 2012 #23
So voters can vote away people's consitutional rights? They can vote to ban abortion? hack89 Jun 2012 #24
Unconstitutional according to who? Scalia? DanTex Jun 2012 #25
I agree with Heller. None of the others. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #26
Most agree Heller, in that the court held safeinOhio Jun 2012 #27
There will be more court cases hack89 Jun 2012 #29
But, you said you agree with Heller. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #31
As a good first step hack89 Jun 2012 #32
If the Scalia court did not attempt to overturn Rove v Wade hack89 Jun 2012 #34
Read the minority response to the courts decision. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #35
You are willfully misreading the laws across the states ProgressiveProfessor Jun 2012 #13
Agreeing to and meeting for a duel is consipiracy to commit a crime. hack89 Jun 2012 #7
I did some searching and it's not clear that dueling is outlawed everywhere. Seems it would be. AlinPA Jun 2012 #21
A simple and non-controversial fix hack89 Jun 2012 #22
You lost me at "each of us threatens the other" slackmaster Jun 2012 #18
I wonder if SYG laws may some day be found safeinOhio Jun 2012 #28
By that standard every law in America is unconstitutional. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #30
I think that anytime someone doesn't immediately protect himself, and takes time Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just an observation about...»Reply #2