General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]procon
(15,805 posts)Car accidents, are just that, accidents, and I at least have seatbelts, airbags and maybe even built in anti-collision features to protect me. The car I drive is structurally designed to protect the people inside with lots of tested safety features. To drive a car I have to get my licence renewed, which first required me to take a driving course, pass a vision test, a written test, and then a driving test to prove my proficiency. As a driver, I am required to maintain liability insurance at a minimum to protect people and property that might be harmed by my actions. I also have to obey laws that prohibit me from driving under the influence and follow traffic rules for safety or face the consequences.
Why don't similar standards apply to someone who wants to needlessly carry around a lethal weapon in public?