Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
35. Another false equivalency.
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 12:16 PM
Aug 2016

Why are there all these crazy, imaginary scenarios to try and justify bringing loaded weapons into public spaces?

What am I supposed to be afraid of in looking at the photo on the right? Women in traditional clothing, their race, gender, ethnicity or religion, none of which pose any threat or danger to me. At best they would be a passing curiosity, and I would simply nod or smile at them and go about my business.

On the other hand, if I encountered two armed men carrying long guns with lots of ammo in a store I would be afraid for my safety and I would get away from them as quickly as possible and call 9/11 so the police will check them out. Its not my job to determine why they have brought loaded weapons into a public setting, but since they chose to act out in that manner, I would see them as mentally unstable and incapable of making sound judgement calls or reasonable decisions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I immediately leave the grocery store with the open carry fools. sinkingfeeling Aug 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Orrex Aug 2016 #2
I think they are both examples of insecure men. KeepItReal Aug 2016 #3
Not bothered by either in most cases whatthehey Aug 2016 #4
The women are not dressed to threaten or to look dangerous Fresh_Start Aug 2016 #5
Old habits. Orrex Aug 2016 #7
I see what you did there. NaturalHigh Aug 2016 #9
I see no reason why anyone should open carry in a civilized society. MrScorpio Aug 2016 #6
Open carry is debateabale. Until religion keeps its nose out of policy making, criticize it I will. cleanhippie Aug 2016 #23
Someone dressed in black has no place in today's society? NaturalHigh Aug 2016 #8
HEY, I LOVED JOHNNY CASH packman Aug 2016 #10
The Man In Black was one of the earliest Goths Runningdawg Aug 2016 #42
I immediately leave upon seeing the firearm. LanternWaste Aug 2016 #11
At least the Burka isn't an implicit threat to shoot people. DetlefK Aug 2016 #12
Eye both groups/subjects with interest and a bit of suspicion. jmg257 Aug 2016 #13
I don't see a problem with either. ileus Aug 2016 #14
I don't see it as an either/or situation. world wide wally Aug 2016 #15
Should I see weapons displayed Sherman A1 Aug 2016 #16
I'd rather see weapons in site rather then concealed yeoman6987 Aug 2016 #34
I assume civilian open carriers are looking for altercations and overt intimidation. Paladin Aug 2016 #62
The rifles make me apprehensive True Dough Aug 2016 #17
IMO, carrying a gun in public MUST involve it being securely strapped into a holster... KittyWampus Aug 2016 #18
I know you know that those aren't automatic rifles, as automatic rifles are illegal. cleanhippie Aug 2016 #24
Whatever the f*ck you want to call them. MY point remains, unholstered guns are too dangerous KittyWampus Aug 2016 #31
Lol. It's obvious that you really have no idea how gun work at all. cleanhippie Aug 2016 #33
Excuse me? KittyWampus Aug 2016 #40
Any adult with a clean record can own an automatic rifle. Kaleva Aug 2016 #58
I occasionally see women wearing complete burkas, when I shop, and I don't even raise an eyebrow Siwsan Aug 2016 #19
Okay. LWolf Aug 2016 #20
They present a clear and present danger? To whom and in what way? cleanhippie Aug 2016 #25
To anyone within range, of course. LWolf Aug 2016 #26
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #28
Nope. LWolf Aug 2016 #30
And yet you seem irrationally afraid of an inanimate object. cleanhippie Aug 2016 #32
She's Afraid Of The Object? ProfessorGAC Aug 2016 #41
Confusing concern as fear is the first of many flaws in your argument LanternWaste Aug 2016 #44
An inanimate object... tonedevil Aug 2016 #56
Not at all. LWolf Aug 2016 #60
Unless lawwolf Aug 2016 #52
OK, so "wearing" a gun is the same as wearing a New York Knicks shirt. SwissTony Aug 2016 #59
Look at LWolf Aug 2016 #61
I ignore them and continue on my business. nt hack89 Aug 2016 #21
A burka isn't an implicit threat to my life. A gun is. baldguy Aug 2016 #22
Unless DustyJoe Aug 2016 #48
Stoking baseless RW fears of "the other" still offers no excuse for carrying a firearm in public. baldguy Aug 2016 #63
not the issue DustyJoe Aug 2016 #64
It is the issue. Fearful bigoted cowards want to equate the two - open carry guns & burkas. baldguy Aug 2016 #65
Clothing is not designed to kill people. Iggo Aug 2016 #27
Not sure why these are together ismnotwasm Aug 2016 #29
Another false equivalency. procon Aug 2016 #35
I'd bolt if I saw the guns. a la izquierda Aug 2016 #36
If Trump gets elected True Dough Aug 2016 #46
Here's the thing radical noodle Aug 2016 #37
The question is coupled with pictures meant to play on stereotypes. Sorry. Not Playing! n/t Honest.Dem Aug 2016 #38
Welcome to the DU, Honest.Dem! True Dough Aug 2016 #47
If you feel the need to carry a gun like that in public, then you have mental issues. Exilednight Aug 2016 #39
I have never seen a woman in a burka in Tulsa Runningdawg Aug 2016 #43
Carrying guns? HockeyMom Aug 2016 #45
I would say it depends sarisataka Aug 2016 #49
The rifles are a puzzle DustyJoe Aug 2016 #50
Let's face it - Moms don't want their kids in grocery stores asiliveandbreathe Aug 2016 #51
I fear neither one. GOLGO 13 Aug 2016 #53
I hate Burqas HerrKarlMarx Aug 2016 #54
I...shop. Shandris Aug 2016 #55
Soooooooo many variables go into my analysis of the situations.... Whiskeytide Aug 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's Pretend - Where do ...»Reply #35