Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:23 PM Jun 2012

The Republican Party is the White Party [View all]

Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2012, 07:15 PM - Edit history (1)

Let me rephrase something on edit, since some replies suggest I was not optimally clear.

The Republican party is a racial identity party. It is designed to appeal to white people as white people... not as union-members or as unemployed people or as home-owners... as white people.

It is a crude racial-identity party and the numbers bear that out. It is an almost exclusively white party. Many white people vote Democratic, but the Republican party is pretty close to all white. (A fact that is soft-pedaled in out national dialog because it makes the modern Republican party sound like a racist institution, which it is.

And many millions of white people vote Republican, against all real self-interest, because they perceive it as "the white thing to do." Because the Republican party presents itself as "the white thing to do."

Orginal post __________________________

That is not a critique, it is a fact of contemporary political life.

This does not mean that all white people are republicans. There are millions and millions of reliable white Democratic voters. I'm of European descent and will never vote for a Republican. But no Democratic presidential candidate has carried the majority of white votes since 1964, and it is quite possible that no future Democratic candidate ever will in our lifetimes.

(The Republican party would shift positions to retain a majority of the white vote because it is all they have. If that means becoming more liberal on this issue or that issue they will do so. We do not have 70%-30% presidential elections in this country because by the time a major party got down to 30% there would be a third party of some sort.)

The Republican party is the white party on the same way the Democratic party is the gay party, the black party, the hispanic party, the single woman party, the poor party.

The Republican party:

1) Always receives a good majority of white votes, and
2) Identifies and caters to white people as an interest group

Most (all?) issues that are identifiable as "white interest" are racist. If a voter believes there are "white issues" that person is very, very likely to be Republican.

When the racist vote shrivels over the next generation there will be resulting changes in American politics, and probably changes in the Republican party. But as long as there is a "white vote" (as there is today) the Republican party will be usefully, meaningfully identifiable as "the white party."

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's exactly the point. swayne Jun 2012 #1
The white MALE party. polichick Jun 2012 #2
Well, now, I think we can expand it... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #4
Add the word Xenophobe. JoePhilly Jun 2012 #8
Yes and no cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #6
yes exactly--that's also why they pretend that Dems are "girls" librechik Jun 2012 #7
I, and some others, think the party differences are CLASS, not race. There are plenty of "Whites" patrice Jun 2012 #3
I used to think the same, and there's some truth to the matter Scootaloo Jun 2012 #5
You can think that but it isn't true cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #9
So you are in favor of dividing the parties by race? patrice Jun 2012 #11
. cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #15
What is the logic of "The Republican Party is the White Party"? Not "a", "the White Party" i.e. . . patrice Jun 2012 #20
Using language the way people use language is communicative cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #25
k. "the" is still the definite article, limiting to ONE specific person/place/thing - and - "a" patrice Jun 2012 #33
Ayup, okay, so what happens if you take the white male vote out of the picture? Zalatix Jun 2012 #17
Sorry, I don't understand. White males don't suffer from economic injustice? If I care about patrice Jun 2012 #19
And the Democratic Party isn't? What about poor Whites? Are they better off as Republicans? nt patrice Jun 2012 #10
The Democratic party should become the elderly party as well aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #12
No, it's the party of hate and fear. ananda Jun 2012 #13
Some whites. Zalatix Jun 2012 #18
Which is my point. OP subject is a BROAD brush; what about poor Whites? patrice Jun 2012 #21
It is not broad brush cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #26
So don't play THEIR game. nt patrice Jun 2012 #34
Another DUer pointed out something I found very illuminating: malthaussen Jun 2012 #27
I understand, except that I think we're talking about pie here, not misery. That's the vision thing, patrice Jun 2012 #36
Ummmm Zalatix Jun 2012 #31
We don't need the majority of the White vote, but that doesn't mean that we don't need a significant patrice Jun 2012 #35
Actually, they are a "big-tent" party these days SoCalDem Jun 2012 #14
The white 1%ers and the willfully ignorant. lpbk2713 Jun 2012 #16
And race is a handy way to do that, especially with anyone who is already pissed off about economic patrice Jun 2012 #22
So very true. lpbk2713 Jun 2012 #23
And, in my real life experience, poor white males are more often paranoid rather than not. nt patrice Jun 2012 #24
This PWM sure is malthaussen Jun 2012 #28
Talking about family here, but lol anyway . . . patrice Jun 2012 #29
The Plutocracy is NOT ignorant - they create this divide by design. Zalatix Jun 2012 #32
It is also the KOOK party. michaelcobb Jun 2012 #30
White's Only Party is a better fit Son of Gob Jun 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Republican Party is t...