Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

uponit7771

(93,532 posts)

10. It's overstating the impact cause dems don't care about the emails and this is a turnout election

Reply to OnDoutside (Reply #5)

Thu Sep 1, 2016, 08:52 AM

Sep 2016

... in which there has been no polls were dems care about the email issue to the degree it diminishes enthusiasm.

It was stupid, but 1.5 years worth of media coverage stupid?! ... no

Get it out of the way and then when/if more emails come out, she can just shrug the shoulders and say it's just more of the same.

She's already said it was a mistake, if she says this then they'll want something else... I've been there when someone just wants to beat you up about something you've apologized for and did your best to rectify.

again, Clinton is around the 90% approval among dems... in a turn out election this is waaaaaaay more important than sound bite media

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Morning Joe just declared fRump a total fake candidate: Nothing real there [View all] lindysalsagal Sep 2016 OP

Were they really surprised? avebury Sep 2016 #1

Yes, I think in total it backfired. Aside: Proofreading missed "viscous" --> "vicious". . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #2

well i heard he laid it on pretty thick ;) unblock Sep 2016 #8

Indeed! . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #22

Slug-like Trump leaves a viscous trail of slime behind him. FSogol Sep 2016 #20

Yes he does! It's gooey like trap glue and the RWA Followers get stuck to it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #23

... and then negated all that by going to a touting head to head in WI and Mika overstating... uponit7771 Sep 2016 #3

No, they are unfortunately right. As they said, Hillary needs to come up with some way of getting OnDoutside Sep 2016 #5

It's overstating the impact cause dems don't care about the emails and this is a turnout election uponit7771 Sep 2016 #10

I disagree. It's not the impact on Dems (which I agree with you on) but on Indies and moderate Reps. OnDoutside Sep 2016 #17

There is no way to do this with a prostituted media. anamandujano Sep 2016 #21

Then they have to hugely raise up the attacks on Trump, OnDoutside Sep 2016 #24

I agree that ANY demo candidate should be pangaia Sep 2016 #30

I'm enjoying the show today! PearliePoo2 Sep 2016 #4

They will change their minds tomorrow JustAnotherGen Sep 2016 #6

Back to the emails now Funtatlaguy Sep 2016 #7

He is brightest bulb on his show, some days! imanamerican63 Sep 2016 #9

Audible face palm BumRushDaShow Sep 2016 #11

These are actors, with a camera on them to bring in $$...... as entertainers. pangaia Sep 2016 #12

+1 tom_kelly Sep 2016 #16

So true... {sigh} InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2016 #26

so it seems that morning joe is the only program that is doing any real analysis of trump patsimp Sep 2016 #13

The fake candidate they helped to build Chicago1980 Sep 2016 #14

Sums it up perfectly! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2016 #27

viscous speech? Boomer Sep 2016 #15

viscous, as in slimy and not allowing any traction Bucky Sep 2016 #18

LOL Boomer Sep 2016 #25

I knew if I scrolled down reflection Sep 2016 #19

LOL!! GWC58 Sep 2016 #29

Not GWC58 Sep 2016 #28