Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Whiskeytide

(4,657 posts)
16. The lawyer has, I think, already lost the case...
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:18 PM
Sep 2016

..." 'It's fundamentally unsafe to give machine guns to children,' said James Goodnow, the attorney representing the Vacca family in the suit."

I think that's a true statement - especially fully auto weapons. But Lawyer Goodnow needs to watch how he states that opinion.

Apparently it was the decedent who gave the machine gun to the child. He had worked for the range as an instructor for a year and a half, and putting guns in the hands of children was part of his job. If it was so fundamentally unsafe - enough so that the range should have refused to do it even though the law allowed it - then he should have recognized it as such as well and refused to do it or quit the job.

However - the family should be entitled to a worker's compensation death benefit from the range, as that is typically owed regardless of fault.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FAMILY OF GUN INSTRUCTOR ...»Reply #16