Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! G_j Sep 2016 #1
I'm not familiar with Mr. LaRaviere, but am I am intrigued. Can anyone explain these jonno99 Sep 2016 #2
"empirical evidence " I looked it up... Stellar Sep 2016 #3
I appreciate the response, but it doesn't really answer my question - jonno99 Sep 2016 #4
At Blaine, the way to get high scores is have the children of millionaires be the student body AngryAmish Sep 2016 #12
I'll take your word for it, but that doesn't explain why the school ranking improved. jonno99 Sep 2016 #15
Here in his own words. Rex Sep 2016 #17
So... the environment didn't actually change, the students we simply allowed to taked more jonno99 Sep 2016 #18
Well there is more if you keep reading. Rex Sep 2016 #21
Chuckles - actually no. Please excuse me if I don't regulary engage in "administrative policy speak" jonno99 Sep 2016 #30
It is called leadership. Not rocket science. Rex Sep 2016 #39
Well I've never really had to engage in either one, so I defer to you: jonno99 Sep 2016 #41
Not so. Principals are the instructional leaders of their schools, professionalize their staff ancianita Sep 2016 #22
He lead a talented team and improved the school system. Rex Sep 2016 #24
Yep. Any city school system needs many more principals like La Raviere. ancianita Sep 2016 #25
Blaine, like a number of other schools in the area, is located in a rapidly gentrifying neighborhood alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #35
Interesting. I've never lived in a district with schools like Blaine. Like my mother would say: jonno99 Sep 2016 #37
Reality based governance, not ideological or faith based governance. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #19
Ok - what does that mean in practical terms? nt jonno99 Sep 2016 #20
In practical terms: If you are too practical about education you don't get much education. Period. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #28
Thanks. I've read your other comments and I appreciate your input. nt jonno99 Sep 2016 #32
isn't testing knowledge the very definition of "empirical evidence"? Mosby Sep 2016 #5
No, because it depends on what you test for and how you test for it. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #26
The Chicago Magazing ranmkings are based largely on test scores alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #36
jonno wasn't asking for the definition of empirical evidence vlyons Sep 2016 #6
Thanks! jonno99 Sep 2016 #7
There is a lot about school learning climates that are not empirically measurable since those ancianita Sep 2016 #29
Obviously it's a complex topic - but something I need to dig into. I appreciate jonno99 Sep 2016 #31
Sure! As big as Chicago is, with hundreds of elementary schools, and over 90 high schools, ancianita Sep 2016 #33
I read the letter, and I think what he is saying LisaM Sep 2016 #9
Oh, of course... Stellar Sep 2016 #11
Being in one of the most expensive neighborhoods in Chicago definitely helps. Ace Rothstein Sep 2016 #8
IMHO, they would if the same amount of money was spent. wcast Sep 2016 #14
That would likely be tried by principals of those neighborhoods. Principals across the ancianita Sep 2016 #23
Probably not... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #42
Clean link to Full Letter, rather than Alternet's excerpt Sentath Sep 2016 #10
It was embedded in the link above. Stellar Sep 2016 #13
in a dream DonCoquixote Sep 2016 #16
Mmmmmm alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #27
I put two kids through CPS, and was a CPS high school teacher. I feel you. ancianita Sep 2016 #34
The puzzling thing about this thread is it's not easy to tell jonno99 Sep 2016 #38
LaRiviere probably has some decent ideas but is a self serving showboater alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #40
What is wrong about publicly standing up for a principle (no pun intended)? LiberalLovinLug Sep 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Principal of Chicago's #1...»Reply #32