Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 11 facts about gun violence in the United States [View all]Straw Man
(6,955 posts)109. Exactly.
that is NRA group speak scarcity trickles all the way down the chain. Many people weren't criminals until they were.
OK -- so you want to make it harder for responsible people to own firearms so that there won't be as many for criminals to steal? And you want to preemptively take away rights from people who aren't criminals because they might someday become criminals?
What kind of group-speak is that?
I don't think you are the problem I believe you when you say that you are a responsible gun owner. What I don't buy is the idea that most gun owners are. I think a lot of them think they are but few really are. I think many gun owners think because they haven't shot someone they are a responsible gun owner.
And you base this on your own personal experience of gun owners, which is (a) limited, and (b) atypical.
I want to know that when you buy a gun you are taking responsibility for that gun (not you personally) that if something happens with that gun there is no mistaking it was your gun and that you were responsible for it and i want you held responsible for the damage that was done.
Guess what? When somebody does something irresponsible with a gun, that person is responsible for the damage that was done with it. If someone steals my gun, I'm no longer responsible for it. The only way your registration scenario accomplishes anything is if (a) I give my gun to someone who is irresponsible or a criminal, (b) that person commits a crime with it, (c) that person is apprehended, and (d) that person has my gun in his/her possession when he/she is apprehended. That's a lot of conditions to meet.
None of that would effect you in any way if you are the person you say you are and I believe you are. You would register your guns responsibly and go about doing your thing.
As I've told you, I already do -- the handguns, as required by law. Now there is talk in NY about a ban on all semi-autos, which are far and away the most popular and numerous handguns in the world today. If such a thing were to pass, I would have no choice but to comply. They know where I live.
I would be a lot more comfortable with talk of registration on the whole if it wasn't coming from the mouths of people who advocate such bans. As it is, I see no reason to compromise with people whose idea of meeting halfway is to only force you to take one step backwards rather than two.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
America First in Murders is OK with gunners, as long as they can arm up and tote in public.
Hoyt
Sep 2016
#1
Fact 12: My neighbor just grabbed his dad's gun after an argument and killed himself
AllyCat
Sep 2016
#3
You think the chances of someone dying from a round house are equal to the chances of a gun?
Egnever
Sep 2016
#25
Dont know where you are getting I am preemptively taking rights away from people
Egnever
Sep 2016
#111
A favorite saying among gun rights people is that we always claim that 'blood will run in the
flamin lib
Sep 2016
#5
False comparison. Except for the fact that auto makers killed the streetcars in the USA.
JanMichael
Sep 2016
#12
My car is insured. I'm required to pass a test to use it. Every year, I pay to register it with the
LanternWaste
Sep 2016
#14
Just as everyone is not capable of operating a vehicle, likewise not everyone is
Thinkingabout
Sep 2016
#30
Designed solely to intoxicate. Plays a major role in addiction, violence and sexual assault.
hack89
Sep 2016
#17
Any other groups you'd like to blame as a whole for the actions of individual members?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#58
Do you believe some sort of collective punishment would be in order for the 'responsible' groups?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#112
The US is ranked 108th in homicide rates....are the other 107 countries more of a embarrassment?
EX500rider
Sep 2016
#37
And *there* is the problem with approaches like yours: "In my own experience..."
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#60