Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 11 facts about gun violence in the United States [View all]Straw Man
(6,955 posts)113. From you.
Dont know where you are getting I am preemptively taking rights away from people
By requiring they register their guns?
By requiring they register their guns?
You've already said that in your ideal world, there would be no guns. Why should I see your insistence on a registry as anything but a way to get to that goal? I've already explained how it would be of little or no use in controlling crime.
Making excuses as to how you can get around it is not an argument against it.
It isn't? So you're in favor of passing easily-circumvented laws that will do nothing against the behavior of criminals? Why, unless it's an incremental step toward an overall ban, something that you've already said you'd like to see.
I find your scenarios constant reliance on gun crimes always being stolen guns to be far fetched.
Either they're stolen guns or trafficked guns. For the most part, people committing crimes are already "prohibited persons." Anyone selling such a person a gun is breaking the law.
I find it even more far fetched if the chances of stolen guns being traced back to their original owner was easier to accomplish.
That makes absolutely no sense. You're saying that criminals wouldn't steal guns if there was a way to trace guns back to their original owner? But there is: the serial number, as reported to the police by the theft victim. Yet criminals continue to steal guns. It's not the only way they get guns, but it's one of the biggies.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
America First in Murders is OK with gunners, as long as they can arm up and tote in public.
Hoyt
Sep 2016
#1
Fact 12: My neighbor just grabbed his dad's gun after an argument and killed himself
AllyCat
Sep 2016
#3
You think the chances of someone dying from a round house are equal to the chances of a gun?
Egnever
Sep 2016
#25
Dont know where you are getting I am preemptively taking rights away from people
Egnever
Sep 2016
#111
A favorite saying among gun rights people is that we always claim that 'blood will run in the
flamin lib
Sep 2016
#5
False comparison. Except for the fact that auto makers killed the streetcars in the USA.
JanMichael
Sep 2016
#12
My car is insured. I'm required to pass a test to use it. Every year, I pay to register it with the
LanternWaste
Sep 2016
#14
Just as everyone is not capable of operating a vehicle, likewise not everyone is
Thinkingabout
Sep 2016
#30
Designed solely to intoxicate. Plays a major role in addiction, violence and sexual assault.
hack89
Sep 2016
#17
Any other groups you'd like to blame as a whole for the actions of individual members?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#58
Do you believe some sort of collective punishment would be in order for the 'responsible' groups?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#112
The US is ranked 108th in homicide rates....are the other 107 countries more of a embarrassment?
EX500rider
Sep 2016
#37
And *there* is the problem with approaches like yours: "In my own experience..."
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2016
#60