Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In defense of Gary Johnson's "Aleppo" question? [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,158 posts)60. Barnicle didn't ask "but ..."; there was no conjunction
It was clearly a new question, from the way he asked it. And, as I said, Johnson had mentioned foreign intervention and regime change just moments before.
You think that other people don't have enough of an 'in depth understanding' to be able to criticise a presidential candidate for not recognising a major battleground. Aleppo has far more people (well, had - many have fled, of course) than Afrin, and has been in the news for years (it's not just 'hot' now), because the fighting there has been sustained. No one can have a decent policy if they don't even know what place is being talked about. You're defending Johnson as being no worse than we are, when he plainly is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The word "Aleppo" alone should have clicked immediately. He didn't have a clue. n/t
michaz
Sep 2016
#2
Apples and oranges. He obviously hasn't been paying attention to events in the Middle East.
redstateblues
Sep 2016
#3
Anyone who casually reads the headline news over their morning coffee knows "Aleppo".
procon
Sep 2016
#15
It was a gotcha question. They are mad that Johnson will take away votes from their idol Trump.
Rex
Sep 2016
#22
Oh, for fuck's sake, they're attacking a candidate who knows nothing about the job he wants
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2016
#43
Not buying it. He is a Libertarian. Those people are isolationists. He ignores news from outside.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#26
I am not a smart person and I knew Aleppo was in Syria from reading my daily newspaper
kimbutgar
Sep 2016
#35
Pretty much. The whole thing is kind of ridiculous, more about signaling by pseudo-experts than
Chathamization
Sep 2016
#42
Nor was there any segue to indicate they weren't talking about polling and the two-parties anymore
Chathamization
Sep 2016
#65
"Can't say I've paid enough attention to Johnson to make that judgement" - then stop judging
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2016
#66
Yeah, we've only been bombin Syria for a few years now, so why should we expect a candidate for Prez
struggle4progress
Sep 2016
#44
I mean, what would you know about Aleppo from reading DU for 2 weeks, for instance?
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2016
#46