Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(19,497 posts)

17. I understood what you were going for. I just wanted to offer a

Mon Sep 12, 2016, 01:09 PM

Sep 2016

clarification before someone charged in to jump your case.

You know how things can be around here, sometimes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How can the House impeach the IRS chief? [View all] Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 OP

Article II, Section 4 atreides1 Sep 2016 #1

Is he an officer or an employee? Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 #8

He is without question an officer FBaggins Sep 2016 #11

Then I guess that makes sense. Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 #13

THIS House indeed "still sucks" FBaggins Sep 2016 #14

Yep. The actual definition lies elsewhere in the Constitution.... Xithras Sep 2016 #15

Congres has SOME authority over ALL executive-branch positions FBaggins Sep 2016 #2

Of course you're correct. I had it exactly backwards FBaggins Sep 2016 #5

I understood what you were going for. I just wanted to offer a Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #17

No they don't. They think they do but executive employees Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 #9

Repeating a claim doesn't make it more believable. FBaggins Sep 2016 #10

GS and SES employees under the executive branxh Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 #12

How can they do it? It beats working gratuitous Sep 2016 #7

they're just marking time barbtries Sep 2016 #16