General Discussion

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)

10. No, you really don't.

Wed Sep 21, 2016, 12:47 PM

Sep 2016

I'm sorry. I have higher standards.

Why don't you apply them equally to humans then?

Where is your hundreds of posts campaign calling for the lifetime ban of any human driver who gets into a < 10mph fender bender, the worst thing autonomous cars have done, exactly once, in well over a million miles (Teslas are not even close to autonomous, have never been claimed to be, and every one of the trivial number of autopilot crashes has been demonstrated to be human negligence and refusal to follow instructions)? Hell to have the same standards you'd have to say humans in general can never be trusted to drive because one of them had a minor flaw.

Where is your consiustency? Either hold humans to the same standard or admit what everyone already knows - that this is some petty personal FUD hobbyhorse.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Your concerns about technology are pure BS. Leave those poor corporations alone [View all] FrodosPet Sep 2016 OP

Nice passive-aggressive post. Odin2005 Sep 2016 #1

Thank you! FrodosPet Sep 2016 #4

And the benefits are? lame54 Sep 2016 #2

Yeah... That kind of does make you a technophobic Luddite. eom VulgarPoet Sep 2016 #3

huh? WestCoastLib Sep 2016 #5

And there are people upset by that very fact FrodosPet Sep 2016 #6

Not seeing it, sorry. WestCoastLib Sep 2016 #9

No, you really don't. whatthehey Sep 2016 #10

Getting old really sucks FrodosPet Sep 2016 #18

All of those things are existing road hazards Codeine Sep 2016 #33

You are correct. No more strawmen posts. Not sure if I will even leave uncommented news stories FrodosPet Sep 2016 #40

Everyone likes and dislikes regulation The2ndWheel Sep 2016 #12

And the advancement of science and technology has even higher standards than you LanternWaste Sep 2016 #15

Another bullshit FUD strawman whatthehey Sep 2016 #7

I have NOTHING against deploying the tech when ready FrodosPet Sep 2016 #25

Oh, look. Another luddite. Act_of_Reparation Sep 2016 #8

Getting old should be illegal FrodosPet Sep 2016 #19

No, but it should impart humility. Act_of_Reparation Sep 2016 #27

I for one, welcome our new robotic overlords. Hugin Sep 2016 #11

With any luck at all they'll be equipped with Galaxy 7 style batteries. Hugin Sep 2016 #17

Robots shouldn't have tweaker teeth. Codeine Sep 2016 #34

Word on the street is this is the clocker with the apple jack. Hugin Sep 2016 #37

People die every day from human error Egnever Sep 2016 #13

Apples and Oranges. Good for dessert, bad for comparisons FrodosPet Sep 2016 #21

You must hate the space program yeoman6987 Sep 2016 #26

And -I- am supposed to be the "strawman guy" in this thread? FrodosPet Sep 2016 #28

I admit it was strawman but it was the only thing at the time I could equate to it yeoman6987 Sep 2016 #29

The benefits and potential are already being realized Major Nikon Sep 2016 #49

No more and no less than the transformation to the combustion engine from the horse and buggy LanternWaste Sep 2016 #14

What you have to do is accept that you don't matter The2ndWheel Sep 2016 #16

I am trying, but that is very difficult FrodosPet Sep 2016 #22

Wow. No posts about teh impossible, can't drive in the snow Glassunion Sep 2016 #20

I guess all that does not matter FrodosPet Sep 2016 #23

You raise some excellent points Glassunion Sep 2016 #24

And how about the fucking Grapevine in SoCal. longship Sep 2016 #30

What about Grapevine? Glassunion Sep 2016 #31

How many of those miles experience rain or snow? longship Sep 2016 #32

They don't only get tested in CA and NV when the weather is good. Glassunion Sep 2016 #35

My safety standards are simple. longship Sep 2016 #36

How is insurance a game stopper? Egnever Sep 2016 #39

Right now, no insurance company is going to insure one for a reasonable price. longship Sep 2016 #41

You keep saying things as if they are fact but they aren't. Egnever Sep 2016 #42

No true Scotsman! longship Sep 2016 #43

At this point I think it is pretty clear you are not interested in facts Egnever Sep 2016 #44

No! You are wrong. I am interested in safety longship Sep 2016 #45

And yet in every accident they have been in except one 2mph fender bender. Egnever Sep 2016 #46

But, I thought that they were autonomous!! longship Sep 2016 #48

A lot more now Egnever Sep 2016 #38

A good start. longship Sep 2016 #47