Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,696 posts)
13. Of course everyone
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:31 PM
Sep 2016

Regardless of skin color should have the same rights; including the right to keep and bear arms.

It is amazing that anyone on a Democratic site would waffle at the question of equal rights.

Edit to add - stop and frisk is an abomination on par with Bush's Patriot Act. It should exist in no form in this country.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He walked that back ....now it would only cover Chicago Angry Dragon Sep 2016 #1
I'm sorry, I must be missing something. What is the fundamental difference that will exist... Shandris Sep 2016 #2
Please review the last couple of days of posts in GD referencing tRump's proposal Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #15
We should all enjoy the same rights, period. n/t bluesbassman Sep 2016 #3
It's pretty obvious why YOU are asking DU this question. n/t kcr Sep 2016 #4
And your view? Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #12
My view is it's clear from the responses to your OP that no one is buying it n/t kcr Sep 2016 #16
Hehehehehehe malaise Sep 2016 #26
I do not believe your question is in good faith nor sincere. LanternWaste Sep 2016 #5
Exactly. Hoyt Sep 2016 #10
Oh, my. Just start out with a question of character, why don't you? Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #14
*Anything* to avoid admitting that S&F originated from a leading gun control advocate, Bloomberg... friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #34
*Anything* to avoid admitting some don't give a shit about black people being killed. kcr Sep 2016 #37
"Stop and frisk has nothing to do with gun control." Bullshit. That's how it was marketed friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #41
I don't see how the question can be insincere sarisataka Sep 2016 #17
I think the attacks on the OP's character are meant to avoid an awkward question. friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #33
Every now and then the gungeon tends to back up and overflow into GD Major Nikon Sep 2016 #44
Bansalot overflows a lot more hack89 Sep 2016 #45
Yeah right Major Nikon Sep 2016 #47
There should be no gun threads in GD hack89 Sep 2016 #49
Perhaps, but those who own the sandbox say otherwise Major Nikon Sep 2016 #50
So quit whining when pro-gun posters follow the threads in GD hack89 Sep 2016 #52
I didn't bring that subject up to begin with Major Nikon Sep 2016 #54
A national Stop & Frisk policy only for POC is absurd. Not only is it blatantly discriminatory Fla Dem Sep 2016 #6
Yes, except the NRA and white gunners have gone too far with gun rights because Hoyt Sep 2016 #7
the same right to bear arms covers EVRYBODY, including ,blacks and soforth . end of story. allan01 Sep 2016 #8
what is poc . do knot know poc. allan01 Sep 2016 #9
Shorthand around here for People of Color. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #11
not just around here. nt La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #19
Of course everyone sarisataka Sep 2016 #13
i dont think individual gun ownership should be so easy, for white people either. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #18
I appreciate your forthright answer. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #20
i think your question is anything but forthright. it sounds like you are pro-NRA and are pretending La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #21
As I said above to snother poster, you are attacking my character and motives... Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #23
No it's the game played when the rest of us La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #35
Your notion of "being played" stems from the cognitive dissonance controllers experience... Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #38
Just as I thought this has nothing to do with bein La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #39
Heh. I am "absolutely" opposed to criminals having guns. But due process is required Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #40
+1. Couldn't have said it better myself... friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #42
You can be a progressive on the 2A without the NRA. ileus Sep 2016 #60
Being progressive on the 2A includes reading La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #61
If one supports "Stop and Frisk", the answer to your question is "no". JoePhilly Sep 2016 #22
SAF is purely discriminatory in nature Calculating Sep 2016 #24
Yes, in many ways. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #25
They already have the right and should exercise it. N/t roamer65 Sep 2016 #27
Of course they should. MicaelS Sep 2016 #28
Is this a trick question? ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #29
Thank you for your answer. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #30
2nd ammendment does not apply to POC If you are a black man and you have a gun in your car Monk06 Sep 2016 #31
Of course! friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #32
I'm not buying it. stone space Sep 2016 #36
The 2nd amendment doesn't "allow" anyone to carry a gun in public Major Nikon Sep 2016 #43
True. Public sentiment is why open carry is popular hack89 Sep 2016 #46
Sure, has absolutely nothing to do with the gunnut lobby allied with the far right wing Major Nikon Sep 2016 #48
The gun control lobby is weak, disjointed and ineffective hack89 Sep 2016 #51
Sure I'm the one excusing reality Major Nikon Sep 2016 #55
The thing is those polls never turn into votes hack89 Sep 2016 #56
Actually, the Second recognizes the right to "bear" arms. It is specious to say Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #57
Someone needs a pocket Constitution. underthematrix Sep 2016 #53
Thank you. I quite agree. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #58
The 2A is there for everyone, so we don't have to be willing victims. Such a basic right... ileus Sep 2016 #59
Though I am horrified by the culture of the gun that has permeated US society etherealtruth Sep 2016 #62
Thank you for your response. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should blacks and POC hav...»Reply #13