Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Your concerns about technology are pure BS. Leave those poor corporations alone [View all]Egnever
(21,506 posts)42. You keep saying things as if they are fact but they aren't.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/06/09/this-company-just-solved-the-biggest-policy-problem-for-driverless-cars/
You may not "trust it" but that has no bearing on reality. Google is up to almost two million miles driven including in washington where it rains all the time and has had one 2mph accident where the autonomous vehicle was at fault. Meanwhile those same vehicles have been hit multiple times by human drivers. The safety issue is clearly not the autonomous vehicle it is the humans.
90% of all accidents are caused by human error.
The insurance industry as a whole is looking askew at driverless cars because they realize they are going to be safer and already are safer.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2016/02/19/autonomous-vehicles-could-drive-car-insurance-companies-out-of-business/3/#5c9fc6df29bf
You think they will end up over a cliff but that is nothing more than your perception. The insurance companies themselves foresee a 90% reduction in accident rates despite you trying to come up with wild scenarios where they will be the most dangerous thing on the road.
No one has died in an autonomous vehicle. Teslas are not autonomous it is driver assist and tesla states in very clear terms that it is not meant to be autonomous.
Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/tesla-mobileye-autopilot-component-conflict/#ixzz4L7uIltQ9
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
"a British insurance company has begun offering a special policy designed for autonomous and partly automated vehicles. In theory, you could use this on your Google driverless car or your Tesla that's equipped with autopilot."
You may not "trust it" but that has no bearing on reality. Google is up to almost two million miles driven including in washington where it rains all the time and has had one 2mph accident where the autonomous vehicle was at fault. Meanwhile those same vehicles have been hit multiple times by human drivers. The safety issue is clearly not the autonomous vehicle it is the humans.
90% of all accidents are caused by human error.
The insurance industry as a whole is looking askew at driverless cars because they realize they are going to be safer and already are safer.
There will be crashes. There will be people injured and killed in these vehicles, he said. Were going to have to hang in there and be ready for these kinds of things.
But few would quibble with a 90 percent reduction in accidents. For every American killed in an accident, another eight are hospitalized, accordion to the McKinsey report, and another 100 are treated and released from emergency rooms:
But few would quibble with a 90 percent reduction in accidents. For every American killed in an accident, another eight are hospitalized, accordion to the McKinsey report, and another 100 are treated and released from emergency rooms:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2016/02/19/autonomous-vehicles-could-drive-car-insurance-companies-out-of-business/3/#5c9fc6df29bf
You think they will end up over a cliff but that is nothing more than your perception. The insurance companies themselves foresee a 90% reduction in accident rates despite you trying to come up with wild scenarios where they will be the most dangerous thing on the road.
A study last year found driverless cars are more likely than human-operated vehicles to be in accidents, but the accidents documented in the study were all the fault of the human drivers of other cars. None of the driverless cars caused an accident. Often, the driverless cars were struck because they were adhering to traffic laws, Burns said, like making sure an intersection is clear before proceeding when a light turns green, only to get rear-ended.
Those human-error accidents should also disappear as the system goes driverless.
Those human-error accidents should also disappear as the system goes driverless.
No one has died in an autonomous vehicle. Teslas are not autonomous it is driver assist and tesla states in very clear terms that it is not meant to be autonomous.
Tesla has never claimed Autopilot is a driverless system. In fact, the firm has provided warnings each time owners activate the system. A Tesla spokesperson replied, as quoted by Electrek. Since the release of Autopilot, weve continuously educated customers on the use of the features, reminding them that theyre responsible to keep their hands on the wheel and remain alert and present when using Autopilot. Drivers must be prepared to take control at all times.
Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/tesla-mobileye-autopilot-component-conflict/#ixzz4L7uIltQ9
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your concerns about technology are pure BS. Leave those poor corporations alone [View all]
FrodosPet
Sep 2016
OP
You are correct. No more strawmen posts. Not sure if I will even leave uncommented news stories
FrodosPet
Sep 2016
#40
And the advancement of science and technology has even higher standards than you
LanternWaste
Sep 2016
#15
I admit it was strawman but it was the only thing at the time I could equate to it
yeoman6987
Sep 2016
#29
No more and no less than the transformation to the combustion engine from the horse and buggy
LanternWaste
Sep 2016
#14
Right now, no insurance company is going to insure one for a reasonable price.
longship
Sep 2016
#41