Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It doesn’t jive’: Ex-LAPD sergeant slams Charlotte police’s story about killing Keith Scott [View all]pnwmom
(110,263 posts)4. If a driver is parked right next to you and doing something in his lap,
then the driver's door is going to obscure what he's doing in his lap. You might be able to see the empty passenger seat, but your angle wouldn't be good for seeing in the driver's lap over the car door.
Go sit in a car and try it if you don't believe me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It doesn’t jive’: Ex-LAPD sergeant slams Charlotte police’s story about killing Keith Scott [View all]
womanofthehills
Sep 2016
OP
That is exactly the kind of stupid interview that made me look so closely at the videos
Egnever
Sep 2016
#1
You might be able to see IF your vehicle was higher than the one next to you, and you
pnwmom
Sep 2016
#6
Again, how did they know it was a joint vs tobacco !?!! Because they thought isn't a reasonable
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#11
Yeap, plenty of it with no aroma and some tabocoo that smells like pot... this LEO would get torn
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#16
1.) He wasn't smoking the pot so it's a strawman to intimate that he was via your own example, 2.)
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#21
The Chief said he was rolling a blunt not smoking one so there goes the LEOs reasoning for engaging
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#46
There's no account of Scott Smoking anything (quote inside) and he could have had multiple
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#52
There's no photo evidence of a gun that has been shown, people aren't giving the CPD unearned BOTD
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#17
This is false, there's been no photo evidence that Scott had a gun in his hand at the time of the...
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#22
Those "citizens" you speak of are his family. Their actions were very peculiar.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#27
No, the people who were protesting ... Tulsa didn't blow up, DFw didn't blow up and other
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#29
Not talking about those cities and those circumstances. Talking about Scott and Charlotte.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#37
Ad homs are an indicator of a weak position. THERE'S NO PHOTO EVIDENCE OF A GUN IN HIS HAND
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#40
Not to make light of this senseless killing, but the WORD IS 'JIBE', NOT 'JIVE', for the Love of Dog
brett_jv
Sep 2016
#7
+1, Not only that but how did hey know it was a joint vs plain tobacco !?!??! and having a gun in
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#10
specualationt, I know people who roll cigs and the smell of unlit tobacco is similar to unlit MJ
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#30
Same, I'll have some unlit tobacoo and unlit MJ and have you smell it from a car with its windows
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#33
Strawman, the Chief of police said he was rolling a blunt not smoking it. (link inside)
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#48
So, you openly admit that he had pot and the cops ignored it until Scott showed the gun.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#53
Of course he had pot, they showed it... I'm not claiming he didn't my position is the LEO didn't kno
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#55
My thoughts exactly. He was in a truck. How did they see his lap, or what was on his seat?
Atman
Sep 2016
#23