Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It doesn’t jive’: Ex-LAPD sergeant slams Charlotte police’s story about killing Keith Scott [View all]Egnever
(21,506 posts)15. Not in my opinion
But then he could have dropped the gun as well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It doesn’t jive’: Ex-LAPD sergeant slams Charlotte police’s story about killing Keith Scott [View all]
womanofthehills
Sep 2016
OP
That is exactly the kind of stupid interview that made me look so closely at the videos
Egnever
Sep 2016
#1
You might be able to see IF your vehicle was higher than the one next to you, and you
pnwmom
Sep 2016
#6
Again, how did they know it was a joint vs tobacco !?!! Because they thought isn't a reasonable
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#11
Yeap, plenty of it with no aroma and some tabocoo that smells like pot... this LEO would get torn
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#16
1.) He wasn't smoking the pot so it's a strawman to intimate that he was via your own example, 2.)
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#21
The Chief said he was rolling a blunt not smoking one so there goes the LEOs reasoning for engaging
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#46
There's no account of Scott Smoking anything (quote inside) and he could have had multiple
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#52
There's no photo evidence of a gun that has been shown, people aren't giving the CPD unearned BOTD
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#17
This is false, there's been no photo evidence that Scott had a gun in his hand at the time of the...
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#22
Those "citizens" you speak of are his family. Their actions were very peculiar.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#27
No, the people who were protesting ... Tulsa didn't blow up, DFw didn't blow up and other
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#29
Not talking about those cities and those circumstances. Talking about Scott and Charlotte.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#37
Ad homs are an indicator of a weak position. THERE'S NO PHOTO EVIDENCE OF A GUN IN HIS HAND
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#40
Not to make light of this senseless killing, but the WORD IS 'JIBE', NOT 'JIVE', for the Love of Dog
brett_jv
Sep 2016
#7
+1, Not only that but how did hey know it was a joint vs plain tobacco !?!??! and having a gun in
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#10
specualationt, I know people who roll cigs and the smell of unlit tobacco is similar to unlit MJ
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#30
Same, I'll have some unlit tobacoo and unlit MJ and have you smell it from a car with its windows
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#33
Strawman, the Chief of police said he was rolling a blunt not smoking it. (link inside)
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#48
So, you openly admit that he had pot and the cops ignored it until Scott showed the gun.
tonyt53
Sep 2016
#53
Of course he had pot, they showed it... I'm not claiming he didn't my position is the LEO didn't kno
uponit7771
Sep 2016
#55
My thoughts exactly. He was in a truck. How did they see his lap, or what was on his seat?
Atman
Sep 2016
#23