Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
14. Not an expert myself, either,
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 03:25 AM
Sep 2016

so thanks for the discussion.

I guess to answer the OPs question in a less NZ-specific way, "What's so bad about the TPPA?" is its implications for national sovereignty when regulation that creates additional costs for businesses can be appealed to an unelected body.

Another example I vaguely recall is Australia wanting to require very graphic anti-smoking ads on cigarette packaging which the tobacco industry felt would hurt their sales and therefore reduce their competitiveness.

The basic principle is why should a company based in another country be allowed to potentially override the decisions of a democratically elected government?

How would the US feel if a Chinese company bought some land next to Gettysburg or Arlington National Cemetery and then used the TPPA to override historic heritage protection laws to build a theme park that was completely out of character for the setting?

I'm all for increasing globalism but not at the expense of democratic accountability and respect for local governments.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is the TPP so bloody ...»Reply #14