Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yikes! A liberal Democrat is running for president. Calls for Medicare for all, a new WPA, massive [View all]Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)52. Wikinews interviews Darcy Richardson, Democratic Party presidential challenger to Barack Obama
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_interviews_Darcy_Richardson,_Democratic_Party_presidential_challenger_to_Barack_Obama?dpl_id=310400
<edit>
Policy
William S. Saturn If you had been elected president in 2008, what would you have done differently than Barack Obama?
Richardson: The fact that President Obama initially appointed Larry Summers as chairman of his White House Economic Council shortly after taking office, should have given everybody pause. Summers is probably more responsible for the countrys current economic mess than any other individual.
As President Clinton's Secretary of the Treasury from 1999 to January 2001, Summers shaped and pushed the financial deregulation that unleashed the near-collapse of Wall Street in the autumn of 2008, particularly when he pushed through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 during the final years of the Clinton Administration legislation, as you know, that had prohibited banks from doing both commercial and investment banking.
An architect-turned-enabler of this never-ending economic crisis, Summers later supported the Commodity Futures Modernization Act that, unbelievably as it might seem, mandated that financial derivatives including the reckless credit default swaps at the heart of the financial crisis could be traded between financial institutions without any government oversight whatsoever.
Its little wonder that Rolling Stone writer William Greider, in a marvelously detailed article in late 2008, pointed out that Obamas choice of Summers and other key economic advisers, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, seemed designed to sustain the failed economic policies of the Bush presidency an administration that never saw the financial crisis coming in the first place.
The Summers appointment told me that the President had no earthly clue how this devastating financial crisis happened or how to reverse it.
Things only got worse after that. President Obama failed to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. He failed to include a public option in health care. He failed to assert his constitutional responsibility during the recent debt limit crisis. Unbelievably, he's failed to protect Social Security and Medicare. He extended the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. He failed to push for cap-and-trade. And he failed to close Gitmo. I could go on, but I think you get the point. If anybody deserves a serious intraparty challenge, it's the current occupant of the White House.
In retrospect, it's really incredible that a Democrat of national stature and credibility hasn't entered this race at least as of now.
WSS: Do you believe Obama has done any good things as president?
Richardson: Nothing I could write a book about, unless it's a work of fiction. He's generally been disappointing, allowing the GOP to frame the debate on issue after issue. Who in their right mind wants the Republicans to dictate fiscal or economic policy in this country? The folks in the Occupy Wall Street movement have already figured that out. It's just a matter of the rest of the country coming to the same conclusion...
WSS: What necessary freedoms are currently lacking in American society?
Richardson: Since the beginning of the Bush Administration, most of our personal freedoms have been under constant attack including freedom of assembly, as many in the Occupy movement can sadly testify.
WSS: Do you disagree with any parts of the current U.S. Constitution?
Richardson: Not really, but I'm not particularly crazy about the second amendment.
WSS: What are some of your policy proposals, and if elected, how would you implement these?
Richardson: First and foremost, I'm advocating a capital levy on wealth, not unlike the proposal currently being debated in Germany and other European countries. Much of our current $15 trillion national debt should be recouped from the rich the pampered and privileged class that hasn't paid its fair share in recent years.
Though I'm still developing my platform, I also support a second stimulus package roughly five or six times the size of Obama's meager $447 billion "Son of Stimulus" to jump-start the U.S. economy; a Medicare-for-All health care plan; and a moratorium on home foreclosures (for primary residences only), not unlike that initiated by Minnesota's radical Farmer-Labor Party during the Great Depression.
I also want an immediate end to the war in Afghanistan and am strongly opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline. The American people are hurting, and they're hurting badly.
more...
<edit>
Policy
William S. Saturn If you had been elected president in 2008, what would you have done differently than Barack Obama?
Richardson: The fact that President Obama initially appointed Larry Summers as chairman of his White House Economic Council shortly after taking office, should have given everybody pause. Summers is probably more responsible for the countrys current economic mess than any other individual.
As President Clinton's Secretary of the Treasury from 1999 to January 2001, Summers shaped and pushed the financial deregulation that unleashed the near-collapse of Wall Street in the autumn of 2008, particularly when he pushed through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 during the final years of the Clinton Administration legislation, as you know, that had prohibited banks from doing both commercial and investment banking.
An architect-turned-enabler of this never-ending economic crisis, Summers later supported the Commodity Futures Modernization Act that, unbelievably as it might seem, mandated that financial derivatives including the reckless credit default swaps at the heart of the financial crisis could be traded between financial institutions without any government oversight whatsoever.
Its little wonder that Rolling Stone writer William Greider, in a marvelously detailed article in late 2008, pointed out that Obamas choice of Summers and other key economic advisers, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, seemed designed to sustain the failed economic policies of the Bush presidency an administration that never saw the financial crisis coming in the first place.
The Summers appointment told me that the President had no earthly clue how this devastating financial crisis happened or how to reverse it.
Things only got worse after that. President Obama failed to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. He failed to include a public option in health care. He failed to assert his constitutional responsibility during the recent debt limit crisis. Unbelievably, he's failed to protect Social Security and Medicare. He extended the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. He failed to push for cap-and-trade. And he failed to close Gitmo. I could go on, but I think you get the point. If anybody deserves a serious intraparty challenge, it's the current occupant of the White House.
In retrospect, it's really incredible that a Democrat of national stature and credibility hasn't entered this race at least as of now.
WSS: Do you believe Obama has done any good things as president?
Richardson: Nothing I could write a book about, unless it's a work of fiction. He's generally been disappointing, allowing the GOP to frame the debate on issue after issue. Who in their right mind wants the Republicans to dictate fiscal or economic policy in this country? The folks in the Occupy Wall Street movement have already figured that out. It's just a matter of the rest of the country coming to the same conclusion...
WSS: What necessary freedoms are currently lacking in American society?
Richardson: Since the beginning of the Bush Administration, most of our personal freedoms have been under constant attack including freedom of assembly, as many in the Occupy movement can sadly testify.
WSS: Do you disagree with any parts of the current U.S. Constitution?
Richardson: Not really, but I'm not particularly crazy about the second amendment.
WSS: What are some of your policy proposals, and if elected, how would you implement these?
Richardson: First and foremost, I'm advocating a capital levy on wealth, not unlike the proposal currently being debated in Germany and other European countries. Much of our current $15 trillion national debt should be recouped from the rich the pampered and privileged class that hasn't paid its fair share in recent years.
Though I'm still developing my platform, I also support a second stimulus package roughly five or six times the size of Obama's meager $447 billion "Son of Stimulus" to jump-start the U.S. economy; a Medicare-for-All health care plan; and a moratorium on home foreclosures (for primary residences only), not unlike that initiated by Minnesota's radical Farmer-Labor Party during the Great Depression.
I also want an immediate end to the war in Afghanistan and am strongly opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline. The American people are hurting, and they're hurting badly.
more...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yikes! A liberal Democrat is running for president. Calls for Medicare for all, a new WPA, massive [View all]
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
OP
So we should just give up and not even promote policies offensive to the oligarchs? Good strategy.
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#4
Yes. Obviously. The idea of leadership is to push towards where we need to be, not to bipartisan
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#10
More on the Consumer Party (a liberal party--thanks for strengthening Richardson's bona fides)
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#23
It strengthens his credibility as a liberal and we should be glad a liberal is running for the
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#63
What do you people MEAN by "fight for it"!??!?! My God, do you want Obama to bust someone in the
uponit7771
Dec 2011
#78
Right. Even a president who openly promised a public option and was ushered into
leeroysphitz
Feb 2012
#99
Anyone who runs in an election without intending to with is a fucking moron.
NYC Liberal
Feb 2012
#148
when obama says "some pretty words tailor-made for the disgruntled Progessive crowd" you LIKE it nt
msongs
Dec 2011
#26
There is no evidence to support the assertion that Obama wants to enact progressive legislation.
girl gone mad
Feb 2012
#115
Perhaps because President Obama's in a place to actually turn words into actions
Arkana
Feb 2012
#129
Pragmatism - in terms of actually passing legislation - has a lot to be said for
karynnj
Dec 2011
#24
I'll give you cabinet posts (esp Treasury) and I think there is a lot that can be done within the
karynnj
Dec 2011
#41
Not the New Democrats! Isn't that the DLC!!!! Yet he is the new hero of the far right
karynnj
Dec 2011
#22
He will get that through a narrowly divided Senate how? Then through a narrowly divided House?
karynnj
Dec 2011
#19
leadership is setting the goal high and working towards it, not surrendering before the negotiations
msongs
Dec 2011
#27
Finally! Someone with fire in their eyes. These other posters are already defeated by pukes
txlibdem
Jan 2012
#84
So why haven't you and people like you been successful? If you think you have all the answers
stevenleser
Feb 2012
#103
hypocrisy knows no bounds when you're trying to defeat a democratic president.. but it sure is
dionysus
Feb 2012
#122
So, this clown has finally realized that you can't accomplish anything positive by running as a
Freddie Stubbs
Dec 2011
#32
At THIS point, I don't care WHO is putting these ISSUES & Policies in the national spotlight.
bvar22
Dec 2011
#36
I guess your smears are ATOMIC SMEARS!!!, but they're still smears. You & Newt seem to have a strong
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#62
He joined the BTP of FL organized on 6-23-2008 right after Obama got the nomination.
AtomicKitten
Feb 2012
#102
You keep saying that but Atomickitten has the links and facts backing him/her up.
stevenleser
Feb 2012
#106
Read the subthread (not that it will matter). Your 'point' has already been addressed.
Karmadillo
Feb 2012
#117
Unless you are claiming some kind of demonic possession, he said it and is responsible for it. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2012
#137
He said what he said, but that doesn't mean he said what you'd like him to have said.
Karmadillo
Feb 2012
#144
But OP is now saying, when he said what he said, it didnt really mean what it sounded like. LOL
stevenleser
Feb 2012
#154
You get them through by hammering the issues year after year and cycle after cycle
TheKentuckian
Dec 2011
#56
Dismiss the former "New Democrat," teabagger, member of the "Consumer Party" and "Justice Party"...
jefferson_dem
Dec 2011
#51
Wikinews interviews Darcy Richardson, Democratic Party presidential challenger to Barack Obama
Karmadillo
Dec 2011
#52
Nice try, but speaking of facts, I addressed your sad mewling on this in another thread. Click
Karmadillo
Feb 2012
#134
You are in a hole. Stop digging. Your person is not who he presents himself to be
emulatorloo
Feb 2012
#156
Just as we suspected, another right-wing shill hoping to siphon off votes. Thanks for the info.
OregonBlue
Dec 2011
#80
I'll donate to his campaign and vote for him in the primary. He says he'll do the things
Zorra
Dec 2011
#69
Doesn't matter what they say, I ain't never gonna vote for the "Consumer Party".
Saving Hawaii
Jan 2012
#83
Everyone here attacks him but no one is discussing what he suggests ....nice discussion board.
L0oniX
Jan 2012
#86
Which begs the question...Is it "liberals" that Dems are opposed to, or is it just Darcy?
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2012
#96
A purist who thinks the Presidency is the only branch of government. This person is off the planet.
RBInMaine
Feb 2012
#108
who? i'll bet the republican congress will certainly support this guy....i'm in
spanone
Feb 2012
#113