Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(34,189 posts)

5. No - and all it would have taken is one check box and some supporting documentation

Mon Oct 3, 2016, 04:01 PM

Oct 2016

See my posts:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2464022

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1587478

When filing the paperwork the Trump Foundation elected to file as a family foundation, not a public one that is allowed to solicit contributions. They could have filed as a dual foundation which can be both - they did not - but then they would have been required to submit additional proof of the activities of the foundation. There are more details and many links in the posts linked above.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Before the effin' media discuss whether the New York AG is being political I have one [View all] malaise Oct 2016 OP

K&R.... sheshe2 Oct 2016 #2

LOL malaise Oct 2016 #3

... sheshe2 Oct 2016 #4

Or he thinks he's untouchable malaise Oct 2016 #11

You are effin' correct. ffr Oct 2016 #9

The Trump campaign is good at shifting the conversation Nevernose Oct 2016 #10