Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ford_Prefect

(8,557 posts)
1. At risk means they are alive, more likely to attempt it, and possibly succeed.
Tue Oct 4, 2016, 04:10 AM
Oct 2016

Rate of suicide is how many are successful.

It can be masked by other conditions. People who drink themselves to death over time aren't typically included, same for addicts, same for homeless who are said to die from exposure and so on. A similar situation applies to those who keep putting themselves into dangerous and sometimes confrontational situations.

In the past the critical difference was judged to be that the person put themselves to death either by direct action, (ie: shot themselves or jumped) or by passive but deliberate means intended to cause death (intentional drug overdose). Those who simply "wasted away" from other conditions and situations, or who died in dangerous circumstances or confrontation were not usually included but a number of Veteran's groups have challenged that idea.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just stumbled across a sh...»Reply #1