Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
55. Corporations Are People
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:14 PM
Jun 2012

Thank you for pointing that out. Exactly the context in which I was writing. Citizens United changed the American political system. It is essentially one dollar, one vote (and Romney's Israeli patron who also holds a US passport stated that he will vote an unlimited number of times) until that Supreme Court ruling is somehow rendered irrelevant. My suggestion for doing that would be free TV ads for all presidential candidates and no paid ads, by the way.

Anyway, let me throw out a flat statement, then we can see if it has weaknesses: if being friendly to business means hurting people, the Government should never be friendly to business. Put differently, the government should of course support the business activities deemed beneficial for society but because they are beneficial to society, not because they enrich an individual who will in turn pay bribes to his political buddies. When politicians claim to be pro-business, they are saying they are anti-people. Clearly, when society needs a business (and surely we need thousands of businesses), responsible politicians will support business...but not when they, say, poison the Gulf or gamble away funds that should have been loaned...to business...for socially beneficial production. It is obvious in our society that aiding business does not automatically help people. What about the reverse? Does helping people automatically help business? I would suspect so - if the population is well-off, secure, content, will it not work hard in some business and spend its wealth as customers of some business? The problem, it seems to me, comes when people and business are set as adversaries: that is what Republican policies (e.g., low capital gains taxes, absence of regulation, stock options not connected to company performance) achieve.

I suspect you understand all this at least as well as I, however, so pardon my long-winded response. I just wanted to get a bit more of the detail out in the open. It really bothers me the way mistreating low-paid, hard-working wage earners is somehow construed in the US as patriotic and good for the economy. I know why the rich say such things, but for the life of me I cannot understand why anyone else would believe such propaganda.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The question is how can government create an environment conducive to businesses creating jobs. dkf Jun 2012 #1
The ONLY thing that "grows businesses" is customers. . .n/t annabanana Jun 2012 #3
Yes, and when people are not working or are not making decent wages Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #5
Conservatives dont want to shrink government. They would expand military spending infinitly. rhett o rick Jun 2012 #10
Yes, you nailed their motives. Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #11
Apple gets more business internationally than domestically. 64% of its revenues are overseas. dkf Jun 2012 #35
and 36% of their sales comes from a market that is 5% or less of the global population TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #58
That's a great point. Major Hogwash Jun 2012 #62
Do you have a suggestion? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #4
We need an atmosphere of certainty for one. dkf Jun 2012 #12
And what about the mountains of cash businesses have accumulated over the past 10-15 years? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #15
That's either cash they've built up because they can't repatriate it without paying hefty taxes or dkf Jun 2012 #20
And what would recommend doing about any of these things? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #21
Business and Government need to cooperate. dkf Jun 2012 #29
So you advocate for another stimulus package? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #31
If it is paired with longer term reform then yes. dkf Jun 2012 #34
What reforms are you looking for? Which ones would excite business? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #41
Everything needs to be an investment for the future. dkf Jun 2012 #47
I like your ideas. Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #50
It is quite a pipedream. It ignores demand and is based on the premise that TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #53
Our companies are finding new consumers all over this world. That is what we should be aiming for. dkf Jun 2012 #61
Yes I have a suggestion, VOTE A STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC BALLOT! xtraxritical Jun 2012 #17
Yes, indeed! Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #22
Democrat Does Not Equal Progressive William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #49
Who are the Green or Socialist candidates? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #54
Bringing Minor Parties into the Debate William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #56
It appears neither the Green Party or Socialist Party has a set candidate. Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #59
Parties in the 2012 Race William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #69
An "atmosphere of certainty"? Ruby the Liberal Jun 2012 #52
I look at it differently.... Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #7
You nailed it. freshwest Jun 2012 #9
Exactly. And it's why regulation works. Auggie Jun 2012 #13
You can't coerce anyone into creating a job. dkf Jun 2012 #14
Get real.... Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #18
Or it encourages them to move elsewhere. dkf Jun 2012 #30
You may not be able to do it but people can be coerced into creating jobs. GOTV Jun 2012 #68
"....an environment conducive to businesses creating jobs...." = a healthy, kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #40
Put everyone to work either in the military or producing weapons 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #48
Easy. Put money in people's pockets. Only consumer demand creates jobs. GOTV Jun 2012 #66
This is something that should be repeated, and annabanana Jun 2012 #2
It depends on what you want the outcome to be nobodyspecial Jun 2012 #6
They don't care ..... Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #23
True and now they are apparently more profitable than ever and not creating jobs treestar Jun 2012 #8
How do you qualify for not fitting in the capitalist mode? Not studying and getting an education? dkf Jun 2012 #16
What about people with no option to get an education? treestar Jun 2012 #19
Are you really that obtuse? Quantess Jun 2012 #26
I'm not advocating for pure capitalism just some recognition on what drives achievement. dkf Jun 2012 #36
Okay, that I can understand. So you are a devil's advocate, then? Quantess Jun 2012 #38
The answer to your question.. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #65
Who in the USA decides "to do nothing"? Oh, besides trust-fund kids who Quantess Jun 2012 #45
Capitalists, always see cutting labor costs as one of the best ways to make a profit. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2012 #24
Of course. And for a few hundred years formula has served well. Zax2me Jun 2012 #25
Yes. It is customers who create the jobs. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #27
Economics 101 Bluzmann57 Jun 2012 #28
China figured it out. dkf Jun 2012 #37
Exactly Samantha Jun 2012 #63
Demand = Jobs. But each job must create a profit to be retained. lynne Jun 2012 #32
And maintain profit (or otherwise enrich executvies) = outsourcing. BadgerKid Jun 2012 #46
The ultimate goal of business The Wizard Jun 2012 #33
as a guy who has owned two businesses hfojvt Jun 2012 #39
Why would you establish a business if there was no intent to make profit? Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #42
the purpose of my business hfojvt Jun 2012 #51
So Government Should Never Be Pro-Business William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #43
Well, Mitt says "Corporations are people, too, my friend." Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #44
Corporations Are People William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #55
Excellent. You said so much very well. Tennessee Gal Jun 2012 #60
Businesses do not exist to create jobs. That is the fundamental problem with capitalism. Zalatix Jun 2012 #57
True...but of course, businesses need to hire people to run them. Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #64
Agreed! n/t hrmjustin Jun 2012 #71
Every business I've ever worked for needed to hire people in order to operate slackmaster Jun 2012 #67
True, but business 101 says hold down expense Spike89 Jun 2012 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Businesses do not exist t...»Reply #55