Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you believe Pit Bulls are inherently dangerous animals, & you support BSL to ban them [View all]Coventina
(29,698 posts)33. I appreciate your efforts.
I hope you can change at least one mind.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you believe Pit Bulls are inherently dangerous animals, & you support BSL to ban them [View all]
baldguy
Oct 2016
OP
If you don't "believe" some dogs are more likely to attack and kill than others
ronnie624
Oct 2016
#4
Dogs that are not properly trained & solcialized, or are subject to abuse & neglect can be dangerous
baldguy
Oct 2016
#7
Excellent point, these killer dogs are obviously NOT pit bulls, but have been maligned by the media
Major Nikon
Oct 2016
#14
Your powers of reasoning are definitely overwhelming and you make an excellent argument here
Major Nikon
Oct 2016
#94
Just like any other rational response to an individual posing a threat to public safety.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#9
Ever notice how some anti-gun people use similar arguments to defend pit bulls
LongtimeAZDem
Oct 2016
#10
Every time a pitbull kills a person, you guys say, "it's not the dog, it's the owner"
LongtimeAZDem
Oct 2016
#24
The NRA and their allies advocate policies with exasperate the problem of gun violence.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#25
Pit Bulls do not commit the vast majority of lethal dog attacks. That is a lie.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#34
Nowhere in my comments have I supported breed-specific legislation; you comment is another lie
LongtimeAZDem
Oct 2016
#123
Nope; I merely pointed out that you use the same arguments as those you oppose
LongtimeAZDem
Oct 2016
#128
And now you're denying the thing that you did, that everyone can see that you did.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#129
Indeed; and as long as you take the appropriate care to ensure that neither
LongtimeAZDem
Oct 2016
#42
Hysteria is pretending one type of dog is responsable for the actions of humans who mistreat dogs.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#134
No I am thinking pipe bombs are not something you take the risk with for a reason
Egnever
Oct 2016
#139
And still the people that create aggressive dogs have no responsibility in your eyes.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#140
"Pit Bull" indentified visually - when identifying a breed visually is no better than random chance.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#27
So, you want to kill MY dog b/c the owner of some random dog in your neighborhood is a callous jerk?
baldguy
Oct 2016
#41
The entire intent & rationale for BSLs is to reduce dog bites. They don't do that.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#44
I guess I have little sympathy because I was recently almost attacked by two neighborhood pits
womanofthehills
Oct 2016
#53
If you had been bitten by one of these man killers instead, you would not be posting today
Jim Beard
Oct 2016
#61
The "actual science" says certain breeds are more likely to kill, contrary to your propaganda
Major Nikon
Oct 2016
#97
Good grief! Some of these responses make this thread sound like Free Republic.
hamsterjill
Oct 2016
#56
I am with you 100% - and their apologists are doing a disservice to so many who pay the price
DrDan
Oct 2016
#99
A large lab can't inflict the same kind damage? Tell that to Isabelle Dinoire.
baldguy
Oct 2016
#144